STOCK COMPARISON
3M vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how 3M (MMM) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: 3M trades at $181 versus a fair value of $40.57 (-78%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.94 versus HK$22.56 (+89%).
3M
MMM · USD · Industrials
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$181
Fair Value$40.57
Quality66/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+89%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$11.94
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality47/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
3MCitic Pacific
Valuation
30.4×P/E (TTM)4.8×
3.28×P/S (TTM)0.34×
17.47×P/B0.37×
14.1×EV/EBITDA2.8×
1.67×PEG1.76×
1.9%Dividend yield5.2%
$2.97Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
11%Net margin6%
23%Operating margin30%
71%Return on equity8%
8%Return on assets1%
Growth
1%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
-10.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
-5.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
2.33×Debt / equity2.03×
$82BMarket cap$41B
weakGrowth qualityexpensive
Citic Pacific leads: 5 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
3Mof which business quality 56 · market factors 69
Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
62
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
32
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
33
23
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
37
20
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
97
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
65
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
65
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
82
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
82
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
3M
DCF Models$76.66
Earnings-Based$69.99
Dividend Discount$27.44
Multiples$115
Asset-Based$6.04
Growth DCF$53.03
Economic Profit$74.15
Growth Earnings$94.47
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Citic Pacific
DCF ModelsHK$43.54
Earnings-BasedHK$38.05
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$44.73
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.67
Growth EarningsHK$53.29
1 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
3M
Bear $30.43Fair Value $40.57Bull $50.71
$181 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$11.94 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
3M · Industrials
Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%
Citic Pacific · Industrials
Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside+89% · Top 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: 3M trades at $181 versus a fair value of $40.57 (-78%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.94 versus HK$22.56 (+89%).
3M has the higher quality score (66/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
