Mustika Ratu Tbk vs Procter & Gamble: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Mustika Ratu Tbk (MRAT) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Mustika Ratu Tbk trades at IDR 440 versus a fair value of IDR 289 (-34%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).
Mustika Ratu Tbk
MRAT.JK · IDR · Consumer Staples
-34%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceIDR 440
Fair ValueIDR 289
Quality54/100
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$146
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Mustika Ratu TbkProcter & Gamble
Valuation
200.0×P/E (TTM)21.5×
0.41×P/S (TTM)3.95×
0.33×P/B6.58×
1.5×EV/EBITDA14.3×
—PEG4.13×
—Dividend yield2.9%
—Dividend per share$4.23
Profitability
0%Net margin19%
3%Operating margin23%
0%Return on equity31%
0%Return on assets11%
Growth
45%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
14.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.7%
5.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.5%
Balance & size
0.00×Debt / equity0.48×
$19MMarket cap$342B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Mustika Ratu Tbk leads: 7 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Mustika Ratu Tbkof which business quality 55 · market factors 61Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
22
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
52
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
85
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
63
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
71
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
91
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Mustika Ratu Tbk
DCF ModelsIDR 670
Earnings-BasedIDR 15
Dividend DiscountIDR 231
MultiplesIDR 263
Asset-BasedIDR 899
Growth DCFIDR 769
Economic ProfitIDR 639
Growth EarningsIDR 16
8 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Procter & Gamble
DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Mustika Ratu Tbk
Bear IDR 169Fair Value IDR 289Bull IDR 444
IDR 440 = current price (white tick)
Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$146 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Mustika Ratu Tbk · Consumer Staples
Quality score54 · below median
Fair value upside-34% · below median
Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Mustika Ratu Tbk trades at IDR 440 versus a fair value of IDR 289 (-34%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).
Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (75/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
