Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Newmont (NEM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) compare, as of Aug 24, 2026.
As of Aug 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Newmont as the less overvalued of the two: Newmont trades at A$180 versus a fair value of A$117 (-35%), while Sherwin-Williams trades at $347 versus $143 (-59%).
Newmont
NEM.AU · AUD · Materials
-35%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$180
Fair ValueA$117
Quality71/100
Sherwin-Williams
SHW · USD · Materials
-59%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$347
Fair Value$143
Quality64/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
NewmontSherwin-Williams
Valuation
11.6×P/E (TTM)31.8×
3.99×P/S (TTM)3.44×
2.94×P/B17.91×
5.9×EV/EBITDA20.1×
2.63×PEG2.55×
0.6%Dividend yield0.9%
A$1.02Dividend per share$3.17
Profitability
34%Net margin11%
61%Operating margin14%
26%Return on equity61%
15%Return on assets9%
Growth
46%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
25.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.1%
15.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.1%
Balance & size
0.15×Debt / equity2.03×
$100BMarket cap$82B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Newmont leads: 10 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Newmontof which business quality 70 · market factors 70Sherwin-Williamsof which business quality 60 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
63
72
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
98
35
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
22
66
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
63
63
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
60
38
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
95
47
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
50
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Newmont
DCF ModelsA$197
Earnings-BasedA$155
MultiplesA$106
Asset-BasedA$21.27
Growth DCFA$150
Economic ProfitA$86.58
Growth EarningsA$189
15 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Sherwin-Williams
DCF Models$142
Earnings-Based$81.13
Multiples$144
Asset-Based$12.49
Growth DCF$134
Economic Profit$140
Growth Earnings$158
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Newmont
Bear A$87.57Fair Value A$117Bull A$245
A$180 = current price (white tick)
Sherwin-Williams
Bear $89.87Fair Value $143Bull $205
$347 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Newmont · Materials
Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-35% · below median
Sherwin-Williams · Materials
Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-59% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Newmont as the less overvalued of the two: Newmont trades at A$180 versus a fair value of A$117 (-35%), while Sherwin-Williams trades at $347 versus $143 (-59%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
