EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Niraj Ispat Industries vs H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Niraj Ispat Industries (NIRAJISPAT) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HM-B) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Niraj Ispat Industries trades at ₹211 versus a fair value of ₹152 (-28%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 173 versus SEK 165 (-4%).
Niraj Ispat Industries
NIRAJISPAT.NSE · INR · Consumer Cyclical
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹211
Fair Value₹152
Quality51/100
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
HM-B.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-4%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceSEK 173
Fair ValueSEK 165
Quality72/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Niraj Ispat IndustriesH & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Valuation
8.3×P/E (TTM)21.3×
—P/S (TTM)1.19×
—P/B6.10×
1.6×EV/EBITDA10.8×
—PEG2.59×
—Dividend yield4.3%
—Dividend per shareSEK 7.10
Profitability
0%Net margin6%
0%Operating margin11%
—Return on equity35%
0%Return on assets7%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
-13.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.7%
0.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
0.08×Debt / equity0.43×
$1MMarket cap$28B
weakGrowth qualitymixed

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) leads: 4 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Niraj Ispat Industriesof which business quality 47 · market factors 16 H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)of which business quality 69 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
33
37
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
79
58
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
62
96
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
32
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
6
70
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Niraj Ispat Industries

DCF Models₹243
Earnings-Based₹127
Multiples₹183
Asset-Based₹178
Economic Profit₹127
Growth Earnings₹450

7 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 255
Earnings-BasedSEK 84.94
MultiplesSEK 182
Asset-BasedSEK 20.51
Growth DCFSEK 244
Economic ProfitSEK 110
Growth EarningsSEK 162

10 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Niraj Ispat Industries
Bear ₹95.40Fair Value ₹152Bull ₹209
₹211 = current price (white tick)
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Bear SEK 111Fair Value SEK 165Bull SEK 225
SEK 173 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Niraj Ispat Industries · Consumer Cyclical

Quality score51 · above median
Fair value upside-28% · below median

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-4% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Niraj Ispat Industries trades at ₹211 versus a fair value of ₹152 (-28%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 173 versus SEK 165 (-4%).

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has the higher quality score (72/100).

See the full analysis →
Niraj Ispat Industries · H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Niraj Ispat Industries

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor CorporationTesla vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.