Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Om Holdings (OMH) and Plaza S.A (MALLPLAZA) compare, as of Aug 21, 2026.
As of Aug 21, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Plaza S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Om Holdings trades at A$0.22 versus a fair value of A$0.10 (-53%), while Plaza S.A trades at CLP 4,000 versus CLP 4,571 (+14%).
Om Holdings
OMH.AU · AUD · Materials
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$0.22
Fair ValueA$0.10
Quality43/100
Plaza S.A
MALLPLAZA.SN · CLP · Real Estate
+14%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 4,000
Fair ValueCLP 4,571
Quality65/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Om HoldingsPlaza S.A
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)6.0×
0.19×P/S (TTM)0.01×
0.29×P/B—
5.2×EV/EBITDA2.3×
5.21×PEG—
—Dividend yield1.7%
—Dividend per shareCLP 68
Profitability
0%Net margin—
1%Operating margin78%
-1%Return on equity37%
1%Return on assets5%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-8.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)19.4%
-3.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)28.4%
Balance & size
0.24×Debt / equity0.32×
$120MMarket cap$9B
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Plaza S.A leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Om Holdingsof which business quality 40 · market factors 30Plaza S.Aof which business quality 64 · market factors 74
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
63
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
33
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
67
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
21
70
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
9
87
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
80
62
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Om Holdings
DCF ModelsA$0.42
Earnings-BasedA$0.03
MultiplesA$0.07
Asset-BasedA$0.37
Economic ProfitA$0.15
Growth EarningsA$0.04
11 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.
Plaza S.A
DCF ModelsCLP 5,184
Dividend DiscountCLP 946
MultiplesCLP 3,939
Asset-BasedCLP 1,371
Growth DCFCLP 5,933
Economic ProfitCLP 8,618
8 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Om Holdings
Bear A$0.08Fair Value A$0.10Bull A$0.14
A$0.22 = current price (white tick)
Plaza S.A
Bear CLP 2,761Fair Value CLP 4,571Bull CLP 10,216
CLP 4,000 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Om Holdings · Materials
Quality score43 · below median
Fair value upside-53% · below median
Plaza S.A · Real Estate
Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+14% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 21, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Plaza S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Om Holdings trades at A$0.22 versus a fair value of A$0.10 (-53%), while Plaza S.A trades at CLP 4,000 versus CLP 4,571 (+14%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
