Portmeirion Group vs Midea Group Co: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Portmeirion Group (PMP) and Midea Group Co (000333) compare, as of Aug 27, 2026.
As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Midea Group Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Portmeirion Group trades at £0.53 versus a fair value of £0.18 (-66%), while Midea Group Co trades at ¥86.18 versus ¥99.66 (+16%).
Portmeirion Group
PMP.LSE · GBX · Consumer Discretionary
-66%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£0.53
Fair Value£0.18
Quality40/100
Midea Group Co
000333.SHE · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
+16%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price¥86.18
Fair Value¥99.66
Quality53/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Portmeirion GroupMidea Group Co
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)14.2×
0.41×P/S (TTM)1.37×
0.76×P/B2.81×
—EV/EBITDA10.6×
—PEG3.00×
3.7%Dividend yield5.0%
—Dividend per share¥4.30
Profitability
-7%Net margin10%
-5%Operating margin11%
-12%Return on equity18%
-3%Return on assets5%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
-6.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.0%
0.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.0%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.07×
$37MMarket cap$94B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Midea Group Co leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Portmeirion Groupof which business quality 39 · market factors 15Midea Group Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 76
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
14
52
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
18
62
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
51
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
62
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
2
82
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
29
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Portmeirion Group
Dividend Discount£0.10
Asset-Based£0.64
2 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.
Midea Group Co
DCF Models¥157
Earnings-Based¥82.49
Multiples¥106
Asset-Based¥21.46
Growth DCF¥144
Economic Profit¥77.14
Growth Earnings¥129
6 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Portmeirion Group
Bear £0.09Fair Value £0.18Bull £0.29
£0.53 = current price (white tick)
Midea Group Co
Bear ¥75.75Fair Value ¥99.66Bull ¥168
¥86.18 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Portmeirion Group · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-66% · bottom 25%
Midea Group Co · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score53 · below median
Fair value upside+16% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Midea Group Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Portmeirion Group trades at £0.53 versus a fair value of £0.18 (-66%), while Midea Group Co trades at ¥86.18 versus ¥99.66 (+16%).
Midea Group Co has the higher quality score (53/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
