EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Roblox Corp vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Roblox Corp (RBLX) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Roblox Corp trades at $36.04 versus a fair value of $21.20 (-41%), while NetEase trades at $130 versus $171 (+31%).
Roblox Corp
RBLX · USD · Communication Services
-41%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$36.04
Fair Value$21.20
Quality26/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+31%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$130
Fair Value$171
Quality73/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Roblox CorpNetEase
Valuation
P/E (TTM)16.1×
7.71×P/S (TTM)4.76×
P/B3.39×
EV/EBITDA12.3×
8.18×PEG1.33×
Dividend yield2.4%
Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
-21%Net margin30%
-16%Operating margin41%
-312%Return on equity22%
-9%Return on assets11%
Growth
39%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
30.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
39.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
2.52×Debt / equity0.00×
$41BMarket cap$81B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

NetEase leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Roblox Corpof which business quality 44 · market factors 7 NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
70
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
89
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
22
95
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
39
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
15
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
7
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
43
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
23
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Roblox Corp

DCF Models$47.02
Multiples$18.52
Asset-Based$0.39
Growth DCF$50.16

3 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.

NetEase

DCF Models$396
Earnings-Based$260
Dividend Discount$74.24
Multiples$161
Asset-Based$33.72
Growth DCF$344
Economic Profit$138
Growth Earnings$329

7 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Roblox Corp
Bear $14.65Fair Value $21.20Bull $27.76
$36.04 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $128Fair Value $171Bull $295
$130 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Roblox Corp · Communication Services

Quality score26 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-41% · below median

NetEase · Communication Services

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+31% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Roblox Corp trades at $36.04 versus a fair value of $21.20 (-41%), while NetEase trades at $130 versus $171 (+31%).

NetEase has the higher quality score (73/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.