EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A vs Vince Holding: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ralph Lauren Corp Class A (RL) and Vince Holding (VNCE) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ralph Lauren Corp Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $337 versus a fair value of $225 (-33%), while Vince Holding trades at $11.11 versus $2.22 (-80%).
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
RL · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-33%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$337
Fair Value$225
Quality82/100
Vince Holding
VNCE · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-80%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$11.11
Fair Value$2.22
Quality44/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Ralph Lauren Corp Class AVince Holding
Valuation
22.3×P/E (TTM)15.9×
22.3×P/E ex one-offs (FY2026)25.3×
2.59×P/S (TTM)0.48×
7.40×P/B2.90×
13.3×EV/EBITDA11.9×
2.16×PEGn/a
−33.3%Fair value upside−80.0%
1.1%Dividend yieldn/a
$3.65Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
13%Operating margin-4%
35%Return on equity21%
11%Return on assets3%
Growth
17%Revenue growth (YoY)11%
8.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-5.7%
13.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.4%
+18.5%Value creation/yr−29.2%
Balance & size
21.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)2.7×
0.44×Debt / equity0.39×
$21BMarket cap$145M
healthyGrowth qualityweak
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A leads: 8 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class Aof which business quality 79 · market factors 41 Vince Holdingof which business quality 42 · market factors 75
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
87
61
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
74
67
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
50
8
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
87
22
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
86
67
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
46
15
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
100
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
39
100
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
100
50

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyRalph Lauren Corp Class APrice $337Vince HoldingPrice $11.11
DCF Models-32%below the price$229-64%below the price$4.05
Earnings-Based-47%below the price$180-59%below the price$4.56
Multiples-31%below the price$233-18%below the price$9.16
Asset-Based-91%below the price$30.55-77%below the price$2.61
Growth DCF-41%below the price$197n/a
Economic Profit-49%below the price$171-71%below the price$3.19
Growth Earnings-19%below the price$272-25%below the price$8.36
Minimum-91%below the price$30.55-77%below the price$2.61
Maximum-19%below the price$272-18%below the price$9.16
Median-41%below the price$197-61%below the price$4.30
Geometric mean-53%below the price$160-57%below the price$4.77

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: 22 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Vince Holding: 12 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
Price $337
Fair Value $225
Bear $154Bull $313
Vince Holding
Price $11.11
Fair Value $2.22
Bear $1.86Bull $2.50

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-33% · below median

Vince Holding · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-80% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ralph Lauren Corp Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $337 versus a fair value of $225 (-33%), while Vince Holding trades at $11.11 versus $2.22 (-80%).

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A has the higher quality score (82/100).

Open Ralph Lauren Corp Class A live analysis →
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A · Vince Holding

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Ralph Lauren Corp Class A

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupAmazon.com vs Booking HoldingsMicrosoft vs NvidiaApple vs Microsoft

Related to Vince Holding

Nvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAlphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs Nvidia
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.