Roche Holding vs Eli Lilly and: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Roche Holding (ROP) and Eli Lilly and (LLY) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.
As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Roche Holding as the more attractively valued of the two: Roche Holding trades at CHF 356 versus a fair value of CHF 357 (+0%), while Eli Lilly and trades at $1,183 versus $389 (-67%).
Roche Holding
ROP.SW · CHF · Health Care
+0%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceCHF 356
Fair ValueCHF 357
Quality76/100
Eli Lilly and
LLY · USD · Health Care
-67%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1,183
Fair Value$389
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Roche HoldingEli Lilly and
Valuation
20.6×P/E (TTM)42.2×
5.11×P/S (TTM)14.67×
9.58×P/B39.94×
14.4×EV/EBITDA30.2×
1.43×PEG1.54×
3.0%Dividend yield0.5%
CHF 9.80Dividend per share$6.23
Profitability
20%Net margin35%
30%Operating margin49%
37%Return on equity107%
13%Return on assets21%
Growth
-0%Revenue growth (YoY)56%
-2.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)31.7%
1.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)21.6%
Balance & size
0.81×Debt / equity1.54×
$324BMarket cap$1.1T
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Even match: 7 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Roche Holdingof which business quality 73 · market factors 76Eli Lilly andof which business quality 65 · market factors 81
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
77
85
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
86
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
74
15
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
90
77
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
59
76
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
90
95
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
93
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Roche Holding
DCF ModelsCHF 308
Earnings-BasedCHF 243
Dividend DiscountCHF 177
MultiplesCHF 362
Asset-BasedCHF 32.87
Growth DCFCHF 276
Economic ProfitCHF 206
Growth EarningsCHF 323
20 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Eli Lilly and
DCF Models$334
Earnings-Based$239
Dividend Discount$115
Multiples$358
Asset-Based$19.94
Growth DCF$187
Economic Profit$347
Growth Earnings$375
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Roche Holding
Bear CHF 227Fair Value CHF 357Bull CHF 514
CHF 356 = current price (white tick)
Eli Lilly and
Bear $216Fair Value $389Bull $582
$1,183 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Roche Holding · Health Care
Quality score76 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+0% · above median
Eli Lilly and · Health Care
Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-67% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Roche Holding as the more attractively valued of the two: Roche Holding trades at CHF 356 versus a fair value of CHF 357 (+0%), while Eli Lilly and trades at $1,183 versus $389 (-67%).
Roche Holding has the higher quality score (76/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
