EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Richards Packaging Income Fund vs Stora Enso Oyj ser. R: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Richards Packaging Income Fund (RPKIF) and Stora Enso Oyj ser. R (STE-R) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Stora Enso Oyj ser. R as the more attractively valued of the two: Richards Packaging Income Fund trades at $22.10 versus a fair value of $18.02 (-18%), while Stora Enso Oyj ser. R trades at SEK 104 versus SEK 126 (+21%).
Richards Packaging Income Fund
RPKIF · USD · Materials
-18%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$22.10
Fair Value$18.02
Quality60/100
Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
STE-R.ST · SEK · Materials
+21%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceSEK 104
Fair ValueSEK 126
Quality55/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Richards Packaging Income FundStora Enso Oyj ser. R
Valuation
20.7×P/E (TTM)11.7×
0.52×P/S (TTM)0.93×
1.03×P/B0.81×
5.5×EV/EBITDA17.0×
—PEG40.97×
6.5%Dividend yield0.2%
$1.32Dividend per share—
Profitability
4%Net margin7%
10%Operating margin5%
8%Return on equity6%
7%Return on assets1%
Growth
5%Revenue growth (YoY)-0%
-1.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-7.2%
-2.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)1.7%
Balance & size
0.22×Debt / equity0.29×
$224MMarket cap$9B
weakGrowth qualityweak

Richards Packaging Income Fund leads: 9 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Richards Packaging Income Fundof which business quality 61 · market factors 50 Stora Enso Oyj ser. Rof which business quality 52 · market factors 45
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
52
33
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
23
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
69
19
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
65
63
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
75
88
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
45
81
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
47
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
59
27
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Richards Packaging Income Fund

DCF Models$32.35
Earnings-Based$10.49
Multiples$31.25
Asset-Based$13.11
Growth DCF$33.85
Economic Profit$14.04
Growth Earnings$21.69

7 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R

DCF ModelsSEK 4.47
Earnings-BasedSEK 8.34
Dividend DiscountSEK 2.83
MultiplesSEK 14.82
Asset-BasedSEK 9.07
Economic ProfitSEK 10.34
Growth EarningsSEK 11.31

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Richards Packaging Income Fund
Bear $13.51Fair Value $18.02Bull $22.52
$22.10 = current price (white tick)
Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
Bear SEK 96.71Fair Value SEK 126Bull SEK 140
SEK 104 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Richards Packaging Income Fund · Materials

Quality score60 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-18% · above median

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R · Materials

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside+21% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Stora Enso Oyj ser. R as the more attractively valued of the two: Richards Packaging Income Fund trades at $22.10 versus a fair value of $18.02 (-18%), while Stora Enso Oyj ser. R trades at SEK 104 versus SEK 126 (+21%).

Richards Packaging Income Fund has the higher quality score (60/100).

See the full analysis →
Richards Packaging Income Fund · Stora Enso Oyj ser. R

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Richards Packaging Income Fund

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Stora Enso Oyj ser. R

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.