EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Shikun & Binui Energy vs China Yangtze Power Co: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shikun & Binui Energy (SBEN) and China Yangtze Power Co (600900) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the less overvalued of the two: Shikun & Binui Energy trades at ILS 4.08 versus a fair value of ILS 2.07 (-49%), while China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥27.75 versus ¥25.13 (-9%).
Shikun & Binui Energy
SBEN.TA · ILS · Utilities
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 4.08
Fair ValueILS 2.07
Quality27/100
China Yangtze Power Co
600900.SHG · CNY · Utilities
-9%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price¥27.75
Fair Value¥25.13
Quality57/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Shikun & Binui EnergyChina Yangtze Power Co
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)19.0×
3.79×P/S (TTM)7.84×
0.77×P/B2.94×
51.8×EV/EBITDA13.1×
—Dividend yield3.6%
—Dividend per share¥1.00
Profitability
-76%Net margin41%
19%Operating margin49%
-14%Return on equity16%
-0%Return on assets5%
Growth
158%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
26.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.4%
38.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
1.63×Debt / equity0.87×
$1BMarket cap$102B
expensiveGrowth qualityexpensive

China Yangtze Power Co leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Shikun & Binui Energyof which business quality 25 · market factors 61 China Yangtze Power Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
2
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
52
28
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
12
86
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
14
36
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
59
65
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
61
100
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
47
43
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
83
53
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
41
69

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Shikun & Binui Energy

Asset-BasedILS 1.15

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

China Yangtze Power Co

DCF Models¥26.40
Earnings-Based¥17.18
Dividend Discount¥26.19
Multiples¥17.26
Asset-Based¥6.38
Growth DCF¥22.39
Economic Profit¥10.45
Growth Earnings¥24.89

21 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Shikun & Binui Energy
Bear ILS 1.55Fair Value ILS 2.07Bull ILS 3.10
ILS 4.08 = current price (white tick)
China Yangtze Power Co
Bear ¥17.43Fair Value ¥25.13Bull ¥31.42
¥27.75 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Shikun & Binui Energy · Utilities

Quality score27 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-49% · bottom 25%

China Yangtze Power Co · Utilities

Quality score57 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-9% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the less overvalued of the two: Shikun & Binui Energy trades at ILS 4.08 versus a fair value of ILS 2.07 (-49%), while China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥27.75 versus ¥25.13 (-9%).

China Yangtze Power Co has the higher quality score (57/100).

See the full analysis →
Shikun & Binui Energy · China Yangtze Power Co

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Shikun & Binui Energy

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to China Yangtze Power Co

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.