EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

SCI Engineered Materials vs ASML Holding: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how SCI Engineered Materials (SCIA) and ASML Holding (ASML) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees SCI Engineered Materials as the less overvalued of the two: SCI Engineered Materials trades at $9.15 versus a fair value of $7.84 (-14%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,514 versus €444 (-71%).
SCI Engineered Materials
SCIA · USD · Information Technology
-14%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$9.15
Fair Value$7.84
Quality67/100
ASML Holding
ASML.AS · EUR · Information Technology
-71%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1,514
Fair Value€444
Quality82/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

SCI Engineered MaterialsASML Holding
Valuation
19.8×P/E (TTM)60.6×
1.50×P/S (TTM)19.31×
2.56×P/B34.78×
9.3×EV/EBITDA49.8×
PEG2.19×
Dividend yield0.3%
Dividend per share€5.90
Profitability
8%Net margin30%
13%Operating margin37%
14%Return on equity54%
9%Return on assets16%
Growth
133%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
-5.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.6%
12.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)18.5%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.14×
$36MMarket cap$682B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 6 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

SCI Engineered Materialsof which business quality 69 · market factors 77 ASML Holdingof which business quality 79 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
59
81
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
41
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
67
86
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
43
42
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
27
35
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
96
81
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
90
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
92
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

SCI Engineered Materials

DCF Models$9.14
Earnings-Based$4.55
Dividend Discount$1.32
Multiples$7.48
Asset-Based$2.13
Growth DCF$8.64
Economic Profit$3.75
Growth Earnings$7.14

20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

ASML Holding

DCF Models€708
Earnings-Based€393
Dividend Discount€127
Multiples€342
Asset-Based€34.21
Growth DCF€664
Economic Profit€376
Growth Earnings€570

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

SCI Engineered Materials
Bear $5.88Fair Value $7.84Bull $9.80
$9.15 = current price (white tick)
ASML Holding
Bear €339Fair Value €444Bull €740
€1,514 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

SCI Engineered Materials · Information Technology

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-14% · above median

ASML Holding · Information Technology

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-71% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees SCI Engineered Materials as the less overvalued of the two: SCI Engineered Materials trades at $9.15 versus a fair value of $7.84 (-14%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,514 versus €444 (-71%).

ASML Holding has the higher quality score (82/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.