Santana Minerals vs Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Santana Minerals (SMI) and Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA (FRE) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Santana Minerals trades at A$0.55 versus a fair value of A$0.04 (-92%), while Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA trades at €46.91 versus €32.15 (-31%).
Santana Minerals
SMI.AU · AUD · Materials
-92%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$0.55
Fair ValueA$0.04
Quality32/100
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
FRE.XETRA · EUR · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€46.91
Fair Value€32.15
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Santana MineralsFresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)15.6×
—P/S (TTM)1.18×
3.09×P/B1.42×
—EV/EBITDA11.5×
—PEG0.77×
—Dividend yield2.5%
—Dividend per share€1.05
Profitability
0%Net margin6%
0%Operating margin10%
-1%Return on equity8%
-3%Return on assets3%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
4.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.4%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-8.8%
Balance & size
4.34×Debt / equity0.48×
$317MMarket cap$27B
mixedGrowth qualityweak
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA leads: 1 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Santana Mineralsof which business quality 40 · market factors 22Fresenius SE & Co. KGaAof which business quality 55 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
6
32
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
0
92
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
34
78
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
15
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
20
60
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Santana Minerals
Asset-BasedA$0.07
1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
DCF Models€28.71
Earnings-Based€17.93
Dividend Discount€16.93
Multiples€43.76
Asset-Based€22.73
Growth DCF€25.33
Economic Profit€23.30
Growth Earnings€39.20
21 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Santana Minerals
Bear A$0.03Fair Value A$0.04Bull A$0.05
A$0.55 = current price (white tick)
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Bear €27.44Fair Value €32.15Bull €48.50
€46.91 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Santana Minerals · Materials
Quality score32 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-92% · bottom 25%
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA · Health Care
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-31% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Santana Minerals trades at A$0.55 versus a fair value of A$0.04 (-92%), while Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA trades at €46.91 versus €32.15 (-31%).
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA has the higher quality score (57/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
