Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Santana Minerals Limited (SMI) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$552M

PriceA$0.5150
Fair ValueA$0.3100
Upside-39.8%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.2300 – A$0.3900

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Santana Minerals Limited (SMI) currently trades at A$0.5150, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.3100 — implying the stock looks roughly 39.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Santana Minerals Limited engages in the exploration and evaluation of gold properties in New Zealand, Cambodia, and Mexico. The company explores for gold, silver, and diamond properties. It holds a 100% interest in the Bendigo-Ophir gold project covering an area of 251 square kilometers located in Central Otago, South Island of New Zealand. Santana Minerals Limited was formerly known as Cerro Resources NL, Non-Cerro del Gallo Projects and Interests. The company was incorporated in 2013 and is based in Brisbane, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Santana Minerals Limited (SMI) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.3100 versus a price of A$0.5150 — about −40% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of SMI?
Our 21-model fair value for Santana Minerals Limited is A$0.3100 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.5150.
What is the quality score of SMI?
Santana Minerals Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.