Mammoth Energy Services vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Mammoth Energy Services trades at $3.39 versus a fair value of $2.09 (-38%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$12.04 versus HK$22.56 (+87%).
Mammoth Energy Services
TUSK · USD · Energy
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$3.39
Fair Value$2.09
Quality37/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+87%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$12.04
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality45/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Mammoth Energy ServicesCitic Pacific
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)4.8×
2.68×P/S (TTM)0.34×
0.57×P/B0.37×
—EV/EBITDA2.8×
—PEG1.76×
—Dividend yield5.2%
—Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
19%Net margin6%
-7%Operating margin30%
-22%Return on equity8%
-4%Return on assets1%
Growth
89%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
-50.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
-32.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
0.17×Debt / equity2.03×
$147MMarket cap$41B
weakGrowth qualityexpensive
Citic Pacific leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Mammoth Energy Servicesof which business quality 37 · market factors 60Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
0
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
40
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
27
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
76
35
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
72
48
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
82
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Mammoth Energy Services
Asset-Based$3.59
0 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.
Citic Pacific
DCF ModelsHK$25.60
Earnings-BasedHK$65.33
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$41.60
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.48
1 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Mammoth Energy Services
Bear $1.38Fair Value $2.09Bull $2.61
$3.39 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$12.04 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Mammoth Energy Services · Energy
Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median
Citic Pacific · Industrials
Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside+87% · Top 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Mammoth Energy Services trades at $3.39 versus a fair value of $2.09 (-38%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$12.04 versus HK$22.56 (+87%).
Citic Pacific has the higher quality score (45/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
