1234 (1234) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$4.1B

1 1234 1234 · HK

PriceHK$3.40

Fair ValueHK$9.87

Upside+190.3%

Quality66/100

Evidence: High Range HK$7.50 – HK$12.23

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 26 valuation models · updated today

Share price −5.3% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$3.13 – HK$3.77 · fair‑value band HK$7.50 – HK$12.23 · the HK$3.40 price screens below the HK$9.87 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1234 (1234) currently trades at HK$3.40, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$9.87 — implying the stock looks roughly 190.3% undervalued today. We read business quality at 66/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1234 generated revenue of HK$4.1B at a net margin of 12.4%. Revenue grew 14.3% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 11.8%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$477M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$4.1B

Revenue growth (YoY) +14.3%

Net margin 12.4%

Return on equity 11.8%

Free cash flow HK$472M FY2025

P/E ratio 7.2

More key figures

Operating margin 13.9%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.2000

Dividend yield 6.4%

EPS growth (YoY) +43.6%

Net cash HK$477M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1234 reported revenue of HK$4.1B in FY2025 versus HK$3.4B in FY2021, a compound +4.8%/yr. Reported net income was HK$502M in FY2025, compounding +1.8%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +4.8%/yr

FY21 HK$3.4B

FY22 HK$3.1B

FY23 HK$3.5B

FY24 HK$3.6B

FY25 HK$4.1B

Net income +1.8%/yr

FY21 HK$468M

FY22 HK$448M

FY23 HK$530M

FY24 HK$461M

FY25 HK$502M

Is 1234 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Apparel Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB HMB	kr 164.90	kr 165.47	+0%
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL	$376.43	$423.69	+13%
Moncler S.p.A MONC	€50.90	€50.69	-0%
Gildan Activewear Inc GIL	$57.04	$34.84	-39%
LPP SA LPP	21,720 PLN	18,670 PLN	-14%
Levi Strauss & Co LEVI	$23.61	$16.83	-29%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1234 (1234) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$9.87 versus a price of HK$3.40 — about +190% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1234?

Our model-based fair value for 1234 is HK$9.87 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$3.40.

What is the quality score of 1234?

1234 has a Quality Score of 66/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1234 (1234)?

1234 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$4.1B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1234?

The net profit margin of 1234 is about 12.4%, meaning it keeps roughly 12.4% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1234 pay a dividend?

1234 currently shows a dividend yield of about 6.35% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.