Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1617 (1617) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$683M

1 1617 1617 · HK
PriceHK$0.5000
Fair ValueHK$0.3700
Upside-26.0%
Quality60/100
Watch 1617 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$0.2800 – HK$0.4600

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 22 valuation models · updated today

Share price −37.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$1.06 HK$0.1269 Fair Value HK$0.3700 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1269 – HK$1.06 · fair‑value band HK$0.2800 – HK$0.4600 · the HK$0.5000 price screens above the HK$0.3700 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1617 (1617) currently trades at HK$0.5000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.3700 — implying the stock looks roughly 26.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 60/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1617 generated revenue of HK$464M at a net margin of 6.6%. Revenue declined 1.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.7%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$19.5M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$464M
Revenue growth (YoY) -1.0%
Net margin 6.6%
Return on equity 3.7%
Free cash flow HK$78.5M FY2025
P/E ratio 21.0
More key figures
Operating margin 4.9%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.0200
EPS growth (YoY) -87.6%
Net cash HK$19.5M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1617 reported revenue of HK$464M in FY2025 versus HK$438M in FY2021, a compound +1.4%/yr. Reported net income was HK$30.4M in FY2025.

Revenue +1.4%/yr
FY21 HK$438M
FY22 HK$634M
FY23 HK$522M
FY24 HK$538M
FY25 HK$464M
Net income
FY21 −HK$59.9M
FY22 −HK$8.1M
FY23 HK$5.2M
FY24 HK$39.9M
FY25 HK$30.4M

Is 1617 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Communication Equipment stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Cisco Systems, Inc CSCO $118.80 $43.05 -64%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co 601138 ¥71.13 ¥25.47 -64%
Zhongji Innolight Co 300308 ¥1,382 ¥223.88 -84%
Eoptolink Technology Inc 300502 ¥748.00 ¥192.70 -74%
Nokia Oyj NOKIA 291.00 CZK 79.13 CZK -73%
Motorola Solutions, Inc MSI $392.23 $190.24 -51%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1617 (1617) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.3700 versus a price of HK$0.5000 — about −26% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1617?
Our model-based fair value for 1617 is HK$0.3700 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.5000.
What is the quality score of 1617?
1617 has a Quality Score of 60/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1617 (1617)?
1617 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$464M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1617?
The net profit margin of 1617 is about 6.6%, meaning it keeps roughly 6.6% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.