2011 (2011) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$747M

2 2011 2011 · HK

PriceHK$1.30

Fair ValueHK$0.6700

Upside-48.5%

Quality44/100

Watch 2011 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.4700 – HK$0.8700

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 14 valuation models · updated today

Share price −3.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$1.13 – HK$1.88 · fair‑value band HK$0.4700 – HK$0.8700 · the HK$1.30 price screens above the HK$0.6700 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2011 (2011) currently trades at HK$1.30, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.6700 — implying the stock looks roughly 48.5% overvalued today. We read business quality at 44/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2011 generated revenue of HK$383M at a net margin of 6.2%. Revenue grew 9.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 14.8%. Net debt stands at HK$39.2M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$383M

Revenue growth (YoY) +9.0%

Net margin 6.2%

Return on equity 14.8%

Free cash flow −HK$965K FY2025

P/E ratio 32.5

More key figures

Operating margin 10.0%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0400

EPS growth (YoY) +143%

Net debt HK$39.2M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2011 reported revenue of HK$383M in FY2025 versus HK$240M in FY2021, a compound +12.4%/yr. Reported net income was HK$23.8M in FY2025.

Revenue +12.4%/yr

FY21 HK$240M

FY22 HK$216M

FY23 HK$267M

FY24 HK$333M

FY25 HK$383M

Net income

FY21 −HK$17.5M

FY22 −HK$1.9M

FY23 −HK$69.0M

FY24 HK$32.3M

FY25 HK$23.8M

Is 2011 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Apparel Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB HMB	kr 166.80	kr 165.47	-1%
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL	$366.55	$365.78	-0%
Moncler S.p.A MONC	€51.22	€50.69	-1%
Gildan Activewear Inc GIL	$58.41	$37.01	-37%
LPP SA LPP	18,350 PLN	20,063 PLN	+9%
Levi Strauss & Co LEVI	$23.61	$16.83	-29%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2011 (2011) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.6700 versus a price of HK$1.30 — about −48% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2011?

Our model-based fair value for 2011 is HK$0.6700 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.30.

What is the quality score of 2011?

2011 has a Quality Score of 44/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2011 (2011)?

2011 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$383M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2011?

The net profit margin of 2011 is about 6.2%, meaning it keeps roughly 6.2% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.