Qingling Motors Co (QGLHF) Fair Value & Analysis
Consumer Cyclical · US · Market cap $261M
Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026
Analysis
Qingling Motors Co (QGLHF) currently trades at $0.1100, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.1859 — implying the stock looks roughly 69.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 93/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.
About the company
Qingling Motors Co., Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, produces and sells trucks under the Isuzu brand in the People's Republic of China and internationally. It operates through Light-Duty Trucks and Chassis; Pick-Up Trucks and Chassis; Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks and Chassis; and Automobile Parts, Accessories and Others segments. The company offers light, medium, and heavy-duty trucks; pick-up trucks; and chassis, automobile parts, accessories, and other products. It also engages in the production of molds for manufacturing automobile parts; and automobile retailing and after-sales services. The company exports its products. The company was incorporated in 1995 and is based in Central, Hong Kong. Qingling Motors Co., Ltd. operates as a subsidiary of Qingling Motors (Group) Co. Ltd.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Qingling Motors Co (QGLHF) undervalued?
What is the fair value of QGLHF?
What is the quality score of QGLHF?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.