EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Tibet Mineral Development Co vs Vale SA: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Tibet Mineral Development Co (000762) and Vale SA (VALE) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Vale SA as the less overvalued of the two: Tibet Mineral Development Co trades at ¥22.08 versus a fair value of ¥4.99 (-77%), while Vale SA trades at $13.82 versus $9.87 (-29%).
Tibet Mineral Development Co
000762.SHE · CNY · Materials
-77%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥22.08
Fair Value¥4.99
Quality56/100
Vale SA
VALE · USD · Materials
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$13.82
Fair Value$9.87
Quality55/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Tibet Mineral Development CoVale SA
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)21.5×
4.85×P/S (TTM)n/a
0.80×P/Bn/a
16.4×EV/EBITDAn/a
n/aPEG0.33×
−77.4%Fair value upside−28.6%
n/aDividend yield9.9%
n/aDividend per share$1.40
Profitability
30%Operating margin28%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)2.67×
0%Return on equity7%
0%Return on assets8%
Growth
190%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
-45.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-4.5%
-1.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-0.7%
n/aValue creation/yr+10.6%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.1×
0.40×Debt / equity0.61×
$2BMarket cap$61B
weakGrowth qualityweak

Vale SA leads: 2 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Tibet Mineral Development Coof which business quality 57 · market factors 33 Vale SAof which business quality 50 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
7
31
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
13
18
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
86
56
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
72
47
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
78
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
58
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
21
50
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
24
64
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
92
89

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyTibet Mineral Development CoPrice ¥22.08Vale SAPrice $13.82
DCF Models-89%below the price¥2.37-21%below the price$10.94
Earnings-Basedn/a-36%below the price$8.84
Dividend Discountn/a-14%close to the price$11.85
Multiples-94%below the price¥1.27-27%below the price$10.12
Asset-Based-83%below the price¥3.76-62%below the price$5.29
Growth DCF-86%below the price¥3.10-17%below the price$11.53
Economic Profitn/a0%close to the price$13.88
Growth Earningsn/a-42%below the price$8.01
Minimum-94%below the price¥1.27-62%below the price$5.29
Maximum-83%below the price¥3.760%close to the price$13.88
Median-88%below the price¥2.73-24%below the price$10.53
Geometric mean-89%below the price¥2.43-30%below the price$9.70

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Tibet Mineral Development Co: 11 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

Vale SA: 18 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Tibet Mineral Development Co
Price ¥22.08
Fair Value ¥4.99
Bear ¥3.79Bull ¥6.07
Vale SA
Price $13.82
Fair Value $9.87
Bear $6.61Bull $12.34

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Tibet Mineral Development Co · Materials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside-77% · bottom 25%

Vale SA · Materials

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside-29% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Vale SA as the less overvalued of the two: Tibet Mineral Development Co trades at ¥22.08 versus a fair value of ¥4.99 (-77%), while Vale SA trades at $13.82 versus $9.87 (-29%).

Tibet Mineral Development Co has the higher quality score (56/100).

Open Vale SA live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.