EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Tianjin Jinbin Development vs DLF: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Tianjin Jinbin Development (000897) and DLF (DLF) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Tianjin Jinbin Development as the less overvalued of the two: Tianjin Jinbin Development trades at ¥1.77 versus a fair value of ¥0.87 (-51%), while DLF trades at ₹660 versus ₹159 (-76%).
Tianjin Jinbin Development
000897.SHE · CNY · Real Estate
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥1.77
Fair Value¥0.87
Quality48/100
DLF
DLF.NSE · INR · Real Estate
-76%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹660
Fair Value₹159
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Tianjin Jinbin DevelopmentDLF
Valuation
P/E (TTM)36.8×
1.39×P/S (TTM)19.87×
0.15×P/B3.58×
1.78×PEG0.14×
Dividend yield1.2%
Dividend per share₹8.00
Profitability
-18%Net margin54%
-4%Operating margin21%
-2%Return on equity10%
-0%Return on assets1%
Growth
-65%Revenue growth (YoY)-42%
-33.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.9%
-25.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.6%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity
$446MMarket cap$17B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

DLF leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Tianjin Jinbin Developmentof which business quality 50 · market factors 32 DLFof which business quality 66 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
7
39
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
40
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
33
98
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
77
63
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
81
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
83
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
14
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
32
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Tianjin Jinbin Development

Multiples¥0.25
Asset-Based¥1.25

4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

DLF

DCF Models₹327
Dividend Discount₹111
Multiples₹147
Asset-Based₹123
Growth DCF₹639
Economic Profit₹181

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Tianjin Jinbin Development
Bear ¥0.83Fair Value ¥0.87Bull ¥0.92
¥1.77 = current price (white tick)
DLF
Bear ₹117Fair Value ₹159Bull ₹327
₹660 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Tianjin Jinbin Development · Real Estate

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-51% · bottom 25%

DLF · Real Estate

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-76% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Tianjin Jinbin Development as the less overvalued of the two: Tianjin Jinbin Development trades at ¥1.77 versus a fair value of ¥0.87 (-51%), while DLF trades at ₹660 versus ₹159 (-76%).

DLF has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.