EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical vs Eli Lilly and: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical (000908) and Eli Lilly and (LLY) compare, as of Oct 4, 2026.

As of Oct 4, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Eli Lilly and as the less overvalued of the two: Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical trades at ¥5.99 versus a fair value of ¥3.02 (−49.6%), while Eli Lilly and trades at $1,143 versus $749 (−34.5%).
Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical
000908.SHE · CNY · Health Care
−49.6%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.99
Fair Value¥3.02
Quality51/100
Eli Lilly and
LLY · USD · Health Care
−34.5%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1,143
Fair Value$749
Quality67/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Hunan Jingfeng PharmaceuticalEli Lilly and
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)37.3×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)24.0×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (9 FY, reported earnings)46.8×
3.96×P/S (TTM)12.82×
n/aP/B38.49×
n/aEV/EBITDA25.3×
n/aPEG1.14×
−49.6%Fair value upside−34.5%
0.1%Dividend yield0.6%
n/aDividend per share$6.46
Profitability
0.7%Operating margin54.2%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.42×
-3.9%Return on equity102.3%
-1.3%Return on assets20.4%
Growth
21.5%Revenue growth (YoY)47.7%
-23.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)31.7%
-15.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)21.6%
n/aValue creation/yr+26.6%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)37.3×
3.12×Debt / equity1.54×
$2BMarket cap$1.0T
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Eli Lilly and, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 9 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings: 46.8.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Eli Lilly and leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceuticalof which business quality 50 · market factors 48 Eli Lilly andof which business quality 64 · market factors 71
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
85
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
22
86
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
73
51
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
33
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
15
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
53
63
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
40
74
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
86

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyHunan Jingfeng PharmaceuticalPrice ¥5.99Eli Lilly andPrice $1,143
DCF Models−92.2%below the price¥0.47−69.8%below the price$345
Earnings-Basedn/a−79.1%below the price$239
Dividend Discountn/a−89.9%below the price$115
Multiples−96.3%below the price¥0.22−68.7%below the price$358
Asset-Based−99.8%below the price¥0.01−98.3%below the price$19.94
Growth DCF−91.4%below the price¥0.52−82.8%below the price$197
Economic Profitn/a−79.3%below the price$237
Growth Earningsn/a−67.2%below the price$375
Minimum−99.8%below the price¥0.01−98.3%below the price$19.94
Maximum−91.4%below the price¥0.52−67.2%below the price$375
Median−94.2%below the price¥0.35−79.2%below the price$238
Geometric mean−97.5%below the price¥0.15−84.1%below the price$182

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical: 10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Eli Lilly and: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical
Price ¥5.99
Fair Value ¥3.02
Bear ¥2.15Bull ¥4.02
Eli Lilly and
Price $1,143
Fair Value $749
Bear $401Bull $974

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical · Health Care

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside−49.6% · below median

Eli Lilly and · Health Care

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−34.5% · below median

Bottom line

As of Oct 4, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Eli Lilly and as the less overvalued of the two: Hunan Jingfeng Pharmaceutical trades at ¥5.99 versus a fair value of ¥3.02 (−49.6%), while Eli Lilly and trades at $1,143 versus $749 (−34.5%).

Eli Lilly and has the higher quality score (67/100).

Open Eli Lilly and live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.