EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Haining China Leather Market Co vs Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Haining China Leather Market Co (002344) and Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A (ATD) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the more attractively valued of the two: Haining China Leather Market Co trades at ¥4.01 versus a fair value of ¥0.94 (-77%), while Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$78.49 versus C$106 (+35%).
Haining China Leather Market Co
002344.SHE · CNY · Real Estate
-77%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥4.01
Fair Value¥0.94
Quality43/100
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
ATD.TO · CAD · Consumer Discretionary
+35%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceC$78.49
Fair ValueC$106
Quality63/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Haining China Leather Market CoAlimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Valuation
100.3×P/E (TTM)16.4×
5.00×P/S (TTM)0.77×
0.61×P/B3.66×
13.2×EV/EBITDA10.6×
n/aPEG1.52×
−76.6%Fair value upside+34.5%
1.0%Dividend yield1.0%
¥0.04Dividend per shareC$0.82
Profitability
16%Operating margin9%
0.75×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.75×
1%Return on equity20%
0%Return on assets7%
Growth
-7%Revenue growth (YoY)-22%
-8.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.1%
-5.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.8%
−23.2%Value creation/yr+7.6%
Balance & size
4.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.4×
0.11×Debt / equity0.64×
$768MMarket cap$59B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A leads: 2 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Haining China Leather Market Coof which business quality 40 · market factors 43 Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc Aof which business quality 60 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
39
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
6
48
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
56
57
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
77
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
83
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
29
41
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
22
42
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
77
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyHaining China Leather Market CoPrice ¥4.01Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc APrice C$78.49
DCF Modelsn/a+19%above the priceC$93.56
Earnings-Basedn/a-43%below the priceC$44.54
Dividend Discount-85%below the price¥0.61-86%below the priceC$10.60
Multiples-73%below the price¥1.10-15%close to the priceC$66.75
Asset-Based+9%close to the price¥4.39-85%below the priceC$11.80
Growth DCFn/a+8%close to the priceC$85.07
Economic Profit+3%close to the price¥4.13-48%below the priceC$41.05
Growth Earningsn/a-11%close to the priceC$70.03
Minimum-85%below the price¥0.61-86%below the priceC$10.60
Maximum+9%close to the price¥4.39+19%above the priceC$93.56
Median-35%below the price¥2.62-29%below the priceC$55.65
Geometric mean-54%below the price¥1.86-47%below the priceC$41.33

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Haining China Leather Market Co: 6 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A: 14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Haining China Leather Market Co
Price ¥4.01
Fair Value ¥0.94
Bear ¥0.70Bull ¥1.38
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Price C$78.49
Fair Value C$106
Bear C$69.02Bull C$214

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Haining China Leather Market Co · Real Estate

Quality score43 · below median
Fair value upside-77% · bottom 25%

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+35% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the more attractively valued of the two: Haining China Leather Market Co trades at ¥4.01 versus a fair value of ¥0.94 (-77%), while Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$78.49 versus C$106 (+35%).

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A has the higher quality score (63/100).

Open Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.