STOCK COMPARISON
Giant Network Group Co vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Giant Network Group Co (002558) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Giant Network Group Co trades at ¥29.34 versus a fair value of ¥15.69 (-47%), while NetEase trades at $132 versus $171 (+29%).
Giant Network Group Co
002558.SHE · CNY · Communication Services
-47%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥29.34
Fair Value¥15.69
Quality75/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+29%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$132
Fair Value$171
Quality81/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Giant Network Group CoNetEase
Valuation
18.4×P/E (TTM)16.1×
6.94×P/S (TTM)4.75×
3.00×P/B3.39×
14.1×EV/EBITDA12.2×
—PEG1.33×
1.4%Dividend yield2.4%
¥0.34Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
37%Net margin30%
48%Operating margin41%
18%Return on equity22%
10%Return on assets11%
Growth
222%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
35.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
17.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
0.00×Debt / equity0.00×
$7BMarket cap$81B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Even match: 6 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Giant Network Group Coof which business quality 74 · market factors 38
NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
53
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
63
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
95
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
95
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
63
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
49
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
27
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
43
45
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
52
89
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Giant Network Group Co
DCF Models¥36.02
Earnings-Based¥24.94
Dividend Discount¥5.08
Multiples¥15.64
Asset-Based¥5.43
Growth DCF¥35.34
Economic Profit¥14.64
Growth Earnings¥31.97
17 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
NetEase
DCF Models$1,933
Earnings-Based$1,295
Dividend Discount$369
Multiples$834
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,771
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,701
0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Giant Network Group Co
Bear ¥11.77Fair Value ¥15.69Bull ¥19.62
¥29.34 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $128Fair Value $171Bull $295
$132 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Giant Network Group Co · Communication Services
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-47% · below median
NetEase · Communication Services
Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+29% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Giant Network Group Co trades at ¥29.34 versus a fair value of ¥15.69 (-47%), while NetEase trades at $132 versus $171 (+29%).
NetEase has the higher quality score (81/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.