EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co vs Samsung Electronics Co: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co (002681) and Samsung Electronics Co (005930) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Samsung Electronics Co as the less overvalued of the two: Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co trades at ¥4.69 versus a fair value of ¥1.41 (-70%), while Samsung Electronics Co trades at KRW 285,500 versus KRW 163,849 (-43%).
Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co
002681.SHE · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-70%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥4.69
Fair Value¥1.41
Quality54/100
Samsung Electronics Co
005930.KO · KRW · Information Technology
-43%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 285,500
Fair ValueKRW 163,849
Quality70/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Shenzhen Fenda Technology CoSamsung Electronics Co
Valuation
0.50×P/S (TTM)n/a
0.58×P/Bn/a
22.1×EV/EBITDAn/a
n/aPEG0.18×
−69.9%Fair value upside−42.6%
0.5%Dividend yield0.5%
n/aDividend per shareKRW 1,488
Profitability
-2%Operating margin43%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.86×
-6%Return on equity19%
-1%Return on assets10%
Growth
-26%Revenue growth (YoY)69%
-1.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.3%
-5.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.1%
n/aValue creation/yr+12.0%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)72.0×
0.34×Debt / equity0.01×
$1BMarket cap$1.3T
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Samsung Electronics Co leads: 0 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Shenzhen Fenda Technology Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 31 Samsung Electronics Coof which business quality 67 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
48
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
24
68
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
45
60
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
75
86
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
94
49
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
70
12
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
18
76
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
7
87
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
92
92

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyShenzhen Fenda Technology CoPrice ¥4.69Samsung Electronics CoPrice KRW 285,500
DCF Models-70%below the price¥1.40-42%below the priceKRW 165,947
Earnings-Basedn/a-75%below the priceKRW 72,540
Dividend Discount-91%below the price¥0.41-89%below the priceKRW 32,330
Multiples-75%below the price¥1.19-44%below the priceKRW 160,812
Asset-Based-83%below the price¥0.81-83%below the priceKRW 49,320
Growth DCF-67%below the price¥1.56-58%below the priceKRW 120,435
Economic Profitn/a-69%below the priceKRW 87,714
Growth Earningsn/a-34%below the priceKRW 188,865
Minimum-91%below the price¥0.41-89%below the priceKRW 32,330
Maximum-67%below the price¥1.56-34%below the priceKRW 188,865
Median-75%below the price¥1.19-64%below the priceKRW 104,074
Geometric mean-79%below the price¥0.97-67%below the priceKRW 94,120

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co: 13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Samsung Electronics Co: 25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co
Price ¥4.69
Fair Value ¥1.41
Bear ¥0.99Bull ¥1.94
Samsung Electronics Co
Price KRW 285,500
Fair Value KRW 163,849
Bear KRW 100,182Bull KRW 232,887

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-70% · bottom 25%

Samsung Electronics Co · Information Technology

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-43% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Samsung Electronics Co as the less overvalued of the two: Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co trades at ¥4.69 versus a fair value of ¥1.41 (-70%), while Samsung Electronics Co trades at KRW 285,500 versus KRW 163,849 (-43%).

Samsung Electronics Co has the higher quality score (70/100).

Open Samsung Electronics Co live analysis →
Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co · Samsung Electronics Co

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupAmazon.com vs Booking HoldingsMicrosoft vs NvidiaApple vs Microsoft

Related to Samsung Electronics Co

Nvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.