EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co vs Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co (002687) and Ralph Lauren Corp Class A (RL) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co as the less overvalued of the two: Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co trades at ¥5.77 versus a fair value of ¥3.72 (-36%), while Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $352 versus $225 (-36%).
Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co
002687.SHE · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.77
Fair Value¥3.72
Quality61/100
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
RL · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$352
Fair Value$225
Quality82/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment CoRalph Lauren Corp Class A
Valuation
36.1×P/E (TTM)23.3×
2.33×P/S (TTM)2.70×
1.87×P/B7.72×
15.3×EV/EBITDA13.9×
n/aPEG2.16×
−35.5%Fair value upside−36.0%
1.5%Dividend yield1.0%
¥0.09Dividend per share$3.65
Profitability
8%Operating margin13%
0.66×EBIT margin trend (5Y)n/a
5%Return on equity35%
3%Return on assets11%
Growth
-4%Revenue growth (YoY)17%
-0.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.0%
3.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)13.0%
−8.1%Value creation/yr+18.4%
Balance & size
268.6×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)21.8×
n/aDebt / equity0.44×
$434MMarket cap$22B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A leads: 5 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Coof which business quality 63 · market factors 67 Ralph Lauren Corp Class Aof which business quality 79 · market factors 44
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
37
87
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
74
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
68
50
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
95
87
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
77
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
65
45
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
70
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
64
48
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
70
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyZhejiang Giuseppe Garment CoPrice ¥5.77Ralph Lauren Corp Class APrice $352
DCF Models-19%below the price¥4.68-35%below the price$229
Earnings-Based-64%below the price¥2.08-49%below the price$180
Dividend Discount-56%below the price¥2.54n/a
Multiples-33%below the price¥3.85-34%below the price$233
Asset-Based-64%below the price¥2.06-91%below the price$30.55
Growth DCF-22%below the price¥4.50-44%below the price$197
Economic Profit-51%below the price¥2.82-51%below the price$171
Growth Earnings-45%below the price¥3.17-23%below the price$272
Minimum-64%below the price¥2.06-91%below the price$30.55
Maximum-19%below the price¥4.68-23%below the price$272
Median-48%below the price¥2.99-44%below the price$197
Geometric mean-47%below the price¥3.07-54%below the price$160

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co: 24 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: 22 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co
Price ¥5.77
Fair Value ¥3.72
Bear ¥2.79Bull ¥4.65
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
Price $352
Fair Value $225
Bear $154Bull $313

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co as the less overvalued of the two: Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co trades at ¥5.77 versus a fair value of ¥3.72 (-36%), while Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $352 versus $225 (-36%).

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A has the higher quality score (82/100).

Open Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co live analysis →
Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co · Ralph Lauren Corp Class A

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment Co

Amazon.com vs Alibaba Group HoldingAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs Booking HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony Group

Related to Ralph Lauren Corp Class A

Alibaba Group Holding vs TeslaToyota Motor Corporation vs TeslaBooking Holdings vs TeslaMicrosoft vs Nvidia
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.