EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Alibaba Group Holding vs Tesla: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) and Tesla (TSLA) compare, as of Sep 9, 2026.

As of Sep 9, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alibaba Group Holding as the more attractively valued of the two: Alibaba Group Holding trades at $113 versus a fair value of $137 (+21%), while Tesla trades at $354 versus $22.22 (-94%).
Alibaba Group Holding
BABA · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+21%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$113
Fair Value$137
Quality48/100
Tesla
TSLA · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-94%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$354
Fair Value$22.22
Quality37/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Alibaba Group HoldingTesla
Valuation
18.2×P/E (TTM)358.8×
P/S (TTM)15.01×
P/B17.88×
0.49×PEG4.94×
+21.3%Fair value upside−93.7%
0.9%Dividend yield
$7.24Dividend per share
Profitability
1%Operating margin4%
0.79×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.73×
9%Return on equity5%
2%Return on assets2%
Growth
3%Revenue growth (YoY)16%
5.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.2%
7.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)24.6%
−3.8%Value creation/yr−0.8%
Balance & size
6.1×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)12.9×
0.22×Debt / equity0.08×
$276BMarket cap$1.5T
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Tesla leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Alibaba Group Holdingof which business quality 47 · market factors 39 Teslaof which business quality 44 · market factors 27
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
41
31
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
20
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
13
52
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
52
82
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
76
23
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
69
14
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
31
30
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
18
37
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
92
32

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAlibaba Group HoldingPrice $113TeslaPrice $354
DCF Models+220%above the price$362-86%below the price$48.33
Earnings-Based+1145%above the price$1,410-90%below the price$35.36
Dividend Discount+137%above the price$269n/a
Multiples+352%above the price$511-94%below the price$19.97
Asset-Based+161%above the price$295-96%below the price$14.65
Growth DCFn/a-87%below the price$47.03
Economic Profit+199%above the price$338-96%below the price$14.42
Growth Earnings+1575%above the price$1,897-87%below the price$46.93
Minimum+137%above the price$269-96%below the price$14.42
Maximum+1575%above the price$1,897-86%below the price$48.33
Median+220%above the price$362-90%below the price$35.36
Geometric mean+376%above the price$539-92%below the price$28.67

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Alibaba Group Holding: 0 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Tesla: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Alibaba Group Holding
Bear $108Fair Value $137Bull $259
$113 = current price (white tick)
Tesla
Bear $16.67Fair Value $22.22Bull $27.78
$354 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Alibaba Group Holding · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside+21% · above median

Tesla · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-94% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 9, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alibaba Group Holding as the more attractively valued of the two: Alibaba Group Holding trades at $113 versus a fair value of $137 (+21%), while Tesla trades at $354 versus $22.22 (-94%).

Alibaba Group Holding has the higher quality score (48/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.