STOCK COMPARISON
Shinsegae vs Falabella S.A: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shinsegae (004170) and Falabella S.A (FALABELLA) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Shinsegae trades at KRW 420,000 versus a fair value of KRW 200,259 (-52%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Shinsegae
004170.KO · KRW · Consumer Discretionary
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 420,000
Fair ValueKRW 200,259
Quality51/100
Falabella S.A
FALABELLA.SN · CLP · Consumer Discretionary
+37%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 6,470
Fair ValueCLP 8,880
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
ShinsegaeFalabella S.A
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)10.7×
—P/S (TTM)1.11×
—P/B1.88×
1.5×EV/EBITDA7.4×
—PEG1.03×
0.2%Dividend yield—
KRW 1,300Dividend per share—
Profitability
1%Net margin10%
11%Operating margin13%
2%Return on equity22%
2%Return on assets4%
Growth
11%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-3.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.7%
7.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
0.54×Debt / equity0.06×
$4BMarket cap$16B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Falabella S.A leads: 3 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Shinsegaeof which business quality 49 · market factors 64
Falabella S.Aof which business quality 54 · market factors 69
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
40
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
55
48
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
23
46
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
80
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
29
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
84
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
71
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Shinsegae
DCF ModelsKRW 631,503
Earnings-BasedKRW 28,661
Dividend DiscountKRW 176,931
MultiplesKRW 284,761
Asset-BasedKRW 340,463
Growth DCFKRW 713,049
Economic ProfitKRW 363,035
Growth EarningsKRW 29,283
14 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Falabella S.A
DCF ModelsCLP 8,510
Earnings-BasedCLP 5,125
MultiplesCLP 8,613
Asset-BasedCLP 2,129
Growth DCFCLP 8,036
Economic ProfitCLP 6,423
Growth EarningsCLP 10,208
5 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Shinsegae
Bear KRW 93,411Fair Value KRW 200,259Bull KRW 223,732
KRW 420,000 = current price (white tick)
Falabella S.A
Bear CLP 5,892Fair Value CLP 8,880Bull CLP 12,406
CLP 6,470 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Shinsegae · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-52% · bottom 25%
Falabella S.A · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside+37% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Shinsegae trades at KRW 420,000 versus a fair value of KRW 200,259 (-52%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Falabella S.A has the higher quality score (57/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
