EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Nam Sung vs Apple: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Nam Sung (004270) and Apple (AAPL) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Apple as the less overvalued of the two: Nam Sung trades at KRW 5,260 versus a fair value of KRW 1,776 (-66%), while Apple trades at $313 versus $123 (-61%).
Nam Sung
004270.KO · KRW · Consumer Discretionary
-66%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 5,260
Fair ValueKRW 1,776
Quality41/100
Apple
AAPL · USD · Information Technology
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$313
Fair Value$123
Quality82/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Nam SungApple
Valuation
P/E (TTM)38.4×
P/S (TTM)10.24×
8.3×EV/EBITDA29.2×
PEG2.56×
3.1%Dividend yield0.3%
KRW 192Dividend per share$1.04
Profitability
1%Net margin27%
6%Operating margin32%
1%Return on equity141%
-0%Return on assets26%
Growth
-7%Revenue growth (YoY)17%
-7.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.8%
-3.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
0.08×Debt / equity1.06×
$18MMarket cap$4.6T
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Apple leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Nam Sungof which business quality 38 · market factors 24 Appleof which business quality 79 · market factors 75
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
9
97
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
36
68
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
21
77
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
28
57
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
17
71
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
8
93
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Nam Sung

Dividend DiscountKRW 51,130
MultiplesKRW 1,776
Asset-BasedKRW 502,268

1 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Apple

DCF Models$170
Earnings-Based$98.15
Dividend Discount$20.06
Multiples$98.04
Asset-Based$3.36
Growth DCF$136
Economic Profit$87.59
Growth Earnings$147

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Nam Sung
Bear KRW 1,499Fair Value KRW 1,776Bull KRW 2,101
KRW 5,260 = current price (white tick)
Apple
Bear $86.44Fair Value $123Bull $192
$313 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Nam Sung · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score41 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-66% · bottom 25%

Apple · Information Technology

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-61% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Apple as the less overvalued of the two: Nam Sung trades at KRW 5,260 versus a fair value of KRW 1,776 (-66%), while Apple trades at $313 versus $123 (-61%).

Apple has the higher quality score (82/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.