EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Daelim Trading vs Procter & Gamble: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Daelim Trading (006570) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Daelim Trading as the less overvalued of the two: Daelim Trading trades at KRW 1,922 versus a fair value of KRW 1,647 (-14%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $148 versus $110 (-25%).
Daelim Trading
006570.KO · KRW · Industrials
-14%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 1,922
Fair ValueKRW 1,647
Quality33/100
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$148
Fair Value$110
Quality76/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Daelim TradingProcter & Gamble
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)21.7×
n/aP/S (TTM)4.20×
n/aP/B6.99× · book value is mostly goodwill
n/aEV/EBITDA15.1×
n/aPEG4.13×
−14.3%Fair value upside−25.5%
n/aDividend yield2.9%
n/aDividend per share$4.23
Profitability
-2%Operating margin23%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.10×
-34%Return on equity31%
-4%Return on assets11%
Growth
19%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-10.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.7%
-4.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.5%
n/aValue creation/yr+8.5%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)22.5×
0.02×Debt / equity0.48×
$20MMarket cap$364B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Procter & Gamble leads: 2 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Daelim Tradingof which business quality 33 · market factors 36 Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
17
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
36
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
6
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
8
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
96
85
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
73
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
12
35
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
91

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyDaelim TradingPrice KRW 1,922Procter & GamblePrice $148
DCF Modelsn/a-32%below the price$101
Earnings-Basedn/a-43%below the price$85.21
Dividend Discountn/a-60%below the price$59.55
Multiplesn/a-19%below the price$120
Asset-Based-12%close to the priceKRW 1,683-90%below the price$14.97
Growth DCFn/a-48%below the price$77.36
Economic Profitn/a-54%below the price$68.20
Growth Earningsn/a-24%below the price$112
Minimum-12%close to the priceKRW 1,683-90%below the price$14.97
Maximum-12%close to the priceKRW 1,683-19%below the price$120
Median-12%close to the priceKRW 1,683-45%below the price$81.28
Geometric mean-12%close to the priceKRW 1,683-53%below the price$69.53

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Daelim Trading: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Procter & Gamble: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Daelim Trading
Price KRW 1,922
Fair Value KRW 1,647
Bear KRW 1,229Bull KRW 2,458
Procter & Gamble
Price $148
Fair Value $110
Bear $72.82Bull $151

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Daelim Trading · Industrials

Quality score33 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-14% · below median

Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples

Quality score76 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-25% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Daelim Trading as the less overvalued of the two: Daelim Trading trades at KRW 1,922 versus a fair value of KRW 1,647 (-14%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $148 versus $110 (-25%).

Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (76/100).

Open Daelim Trading live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.