EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sangji Caelum vs LT: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sangji Caelum (042940) and LT (LT) compare, as of Aug 20, 2026.

As of Aug 20, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sangji Caelum as the less overvalued of the two: Sangji Caelum trades at KRW 6,110 versus a fair value of KRW 4,401 (-28%), while LT trades at ₹4,041 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).
Sangji Caelum
042940.KQ · KRW · Industrials
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 6,110
Fair ValueKRW 4,401
Quality34/100
LT
LT.NSE · INR · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹4,041
Fair Value₹1,994
Quality44/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Sangji CaelumLT
Valuation
P/E (TTM)32.6×
P/S (TTM)1.80×
P/B4.80×
EV/EBITDA16.8×
PEG1.06×
3.3%Dividend yield0.9%
Dividend per share₹38.00
Profitability
-67%Net margin6%
-47%Operating margin11%
-14%Return on equity17%
-1%Return on assets5%
Growth
59%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
-28.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.4%
-3.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)16.3%
Balance & size
0.70×Debt / equity0.58×
$29MMarket cap$55B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

LT leads: 2 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sangji Caelumof which business quality 34 · market factors 17 LTof which business quality 43 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
1
36
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
30
40
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
26
32
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
49
89
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
4
43
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
2
59
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
50
60

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Sangji Caelum

Dividend DiscountKRW 4,328
Asset-BasedKRW 9,760

2 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

LT

DCF Models₹2,695
Earnings-Based₹1,664
Dividend Discount₹649
Multiples₹2,224
Asset-Based₹532
Growth DCF₹2,304
Economic Profit₹1,397
Growth Earnings₹2,459

25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Sangji Caelum
Bear KRW 2,013Fair Value KRW 4,401Bull KRW 7,417
KRW 6,110 = current price (white tick)
LT
Bear ₹1,109Fair Value ₹1,994Bull ₹2,683
₹4,041 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sangji Caelum · Industrials

Quality score34 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median

LT · Industrials

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-51% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 20, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sangji Caelum as the less overvalued of the two: Sangji Caelum trades at KRW 6,110 versus a fair value of KRW 4,401 (-28%), while LT trades at ₹4,041 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).

LT has the higher quality score (44/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.