EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Media Chinese International vs New York Times: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Media Chinese International (0685) and New York Times (NYT) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Media Chinese International trades at HK$0.19 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-84%), while New York Times trades at $64.79 versus $41.95 (-35%).
Media Chinese International
0685.HK · HKD · Communication Services
-84%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.19
Fair ValueHK$0.03
Quality52/100
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-35%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$64.79
Fair Value$41.95
Quality79/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Media Chinese InternationalNew York Times
Valuation
P/E (TTM)27.7×
0.26×P/S (TTM)4.24×
0.33×P/B5.96×
EV/EBITDA22.3×
0.41×PEG3.79×
0.5%Dividend yield1.1%
Dividend per share$0.77
Profitability
-11%Net margin13%
-13%Operating margin13%
-10%Return on equity20%
-3%Return on assets10%
Growth
1%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
5.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
6.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
$39MMarket cap$12B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

New York Times leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Media Chinese Internationalof which business quality 52 · market factors 39 New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
18
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
19
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
10
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
95
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
57
67
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
34
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
27
41
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
98
87

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Media Chinese International

Asset-BasedHK$0.05

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

New York Times

DCF Models$43.20
Earnings-Based$25.06
Dividend Discount$8.21
Multiples$40.11
Asset-Based$8.49
Growth DCF$45.30
Economic Profit$22.32
Growth Earnings$35.48

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Media Chinese International
Bear HK$0.02Fair Value HK$0.03Bull HK$0.04
HK$0.19 = current price (white tick)
New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$64.79 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Media Chinese International · Communication Services

Quality score52 · below median
Fair value upside-84% · bottom 25%

New York Times · Communication Services

Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-35% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Media Chinese International trades at HK$0.19 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-84%), while New York Times trades at $64.79 versus $41.95 (-35%).

New York Times has the higher quality score (79/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.