EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sustainable Forest Holdings vs Simpson Manufacturing Company: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sustainable Forest Holdings (0723) and Simpson Manufacturing Company (SSD) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Simpson Manufacturing Company as the more attractively valued of the two: Sustainable Forest Holdings trades at HK$0.24 versus a fair value of HK$0.19 (−19.1%), while Simpson Manufacturing Company trades at $174 versus $194 (+11.6%).
Sustainable Forest Holdings
0723.HK · HKD · Financials
−19.1%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.24
Fair ValueHK$0.19
Quality45/100
Simpson Manufacturing Company
SSD · USD · Industrials
+11.6%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$174
Fair Value$194
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Sustainable Forest HoldingsSimpson Manufacturing Company
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)19.1×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)17.9×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)22.3×
0.30×P/S (TTM)2.95×
0.13×P/B3.52×
n/aEV/EBITDA12.3×
n/aPEG3.80×
−19.1%Fair value upside+11.6%
n/aDividend yield0.7%
n/aDividend per share$1.17
Profitability
57.7%Operating margin24.4%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.95×
14.1%Return on equity18.7%
7.1%Return on assets9.8%
Growth
-9.4%Revenue growth (YoY)6.3%
-38.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.3%
-22.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)13.0%
n/aValue creation/yr+14.8%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)9.0×
n/aDebt / equity0.18×
$33MMarket cap$7B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Simpson Manufacturing Company, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, FY2018 ex one-offs: 22.3.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Simpson Manufacturing Company leads: 1 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sustainable Forest Holdingsof which business quality 45 · market factors 35 Simpson Manufacturing Companyof which business quality 68 · market factors 41
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
9
63
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
2
40
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
2
58
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
89
87
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
97
58
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
41
54
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
39
38
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
21
34
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
100
98

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familySustainable Forest HoldingsPrice HK$0.24Simpson Manufacturing CompanyPrice $174
DCF Modelsn/a−10.4%close to the price$156
Earnings-Basedn/a−55.0%below the price$78.28
Multiplesn/a−10.1%close to the price$156
Asset-Based−31.9%below the priceHK$0.16−80.9%below the price$33.18
Growth DCFn/a−22.1%below the price$136
Economic Profitn/a−51.0%below the price$85.22
Growth Earningsn/a−22.4%below the price$135
Minimum−31.9%below the priceHK$0.16−80.9%below the price$33.18
Maximum−31.9%below the priceHK$0.16−10.1%close to the price$156
Median−31.9%below the priceHK$0.16−22.4%below the price$135
Geometric mean−31.9%below the priceHK$0.16−42.6%below the price$99.81

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Sustainable Forest Holdings: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Simpson Manufacturing Company: 19 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Sustainable Forest Holdings
Price HK$0.24
Fair Value HK$0.19
Bear HK$0.12Bull HK$0.23
Simpson Manufacturing Company
Price $174
Fair Value $194
Bear $136Bull $270

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sustainable Forest Holdings · Financials

Quality score45 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−19.1% · below median

Simpson Manufacturing Company · Industrials

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+11.6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Simpson Manufacturing Company as the more attractively valued of the two: Sustainable Forest Holdings trades at HK$0.24 versus a fair value of HK$0.19 (−19.1%), while Simpson Manufacturing Company trades at $174 versus $194 (+11.6%).

Simpson Manufacturing Company has the higher quality score (69/100).

Open Simpson Manufacturing Company live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.