EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

iDreamSky Technology Holdings vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how iDreamSky Technology Holdings (1119) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: iDreamSky Technology Holdings trades at HK$0.33 versus a fair value of HK$0.13 (-61%), while NetEase trades at $125 versus $172 (+37%).
iDreamSky Technology Holdings
1119.HK · HKD · Communication Services
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.33
Fair ValueHK$0.13
Quality37/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+37%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$125
Fair Value$172
Quality81/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

iDreamSky Technology HoldingsNetEase
Valuation
30.0×P/E (TTM)16.9×
0.46×P/S (TTM)4.98×
0.37×P/B3.55×
7.3×EV/EBITDA12.9×
PEG1.45×
8.2%Dividend yield2.3%
Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
1%Net margin30%
0%Operating margin41%
1%Return on equity22%
1%Return on assets11%
Growth
-2%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-19.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
-16.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
0.25×Debt / equity0.00×
$78MMarket cap$85B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

NetEase leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

iDreamSky Technology Holdingsof which business quality 35 · market factors 18 NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
20
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
65
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
26
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
30
95
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
98
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
6
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
2
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

iDreamSky Technology Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$0.16
Earnings-BasedHK$0.09
Dividend DiscountHK$0.30
MultiplesHK$0.13
Asset-BasedHK$0.55
Economic ProfitHK$0.49
Growth EarningsHK$0.14

13 of 18 models see the stock below the current price.

NetEase

DCF Models$1,935
Earnings-Based$1,296
Dividend Discount$370
Multiples$835
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,772
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,703

0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

iDreamSky Technology Holdings
Bear HK$0.10Fair Value HK$0.13Bull HK$0.20
HK$0.33 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $129Fair Value $172Bull $282
$125 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

iDreamSky Technology Holdings · Communication Services

Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%

NetEase · Communication Services

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+37% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: iDreamSky Technology Holdings trades at HK$0.33 versus a fair value of HK$0.13 (-61%), while NetEase trades at $125 versus $172 (+37%).

NetEase has the higher quality score (81/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.