EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Tah Hsin Industrial vs Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Tah Hsin Industrial (1315) and Ralph Lauren Corp Class A (RL) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ralph Lauren Corp Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Tah Hsin Industrial trades at TWD 68.30 versus a fair value of TWD 32.87 (-52%), while Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $352 versus $225 (-36%).
Tah Hsin Industrial
1315.TW · TWD · Consumer Discretionary
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 68.30
Fair ValueTWD 32.87
Quality55/100
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
RL · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$352
Fair Value$225
Quality82/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Tah Hsin IndustrialRalph Lauren Corp Class A
Valuation
44.1×P/E (TTM)23.3×
3.11×P/S (TTM)2.70×
0.66×P/B7.72×
n/aEV/EBITDA13.9×
n/aPEG2.16×
−51.9%Fair value upside−36.0%
6.6%Dividend yield1.0%
TWD 4.50Dividend per share$3.65
Profitability
-10%Operating margin13%
2%Return on equity35%
-0%Return on assets11%
Growth
-26%Revenue growth (YoY)17%
-5.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.0%
0.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)13.0%
−20.3%Value creation/yr+18.4%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)21.8×
n/aDebt / equity0.44×
$209MMarket cap$22B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A leads: 2 to 9 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Tah Hsin Industrialof which business quality 56 · market factors 69 Ralph Lauren Corp Class Aof which business quality 79 · market factors 44
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
18
87
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
39
74
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
45
50
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
93
87
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
86
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
45
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
49
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
69
48
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
69
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyTah Hsin IndustrialPrice TWD 68.30Ralph Lauren Corp Class APrice $352
DCF Models-52%below the priceTWD 32.80-35%below the price$229
Earnings-Based-81%below the priceTWD 12.85-49%below the price$180
Multiples-50%below the priceTWD 33.81-34%below the price$233
Asset-Based+4%close to the priceTWD 71.02-91%below the price$30.55
Growth DCF-51%below the priceTWD 33.16-44%below the price$197
Economic Profit-13%close to the priceTWD 59.19-51%below the price$171
Growth Earnings-62%below the priceTWD 25.70-23%below the price$272
Minimum-81%below the priceTWD 12.85-91%below the price$30.55
Maximum+4%close to the priceTWD 71.02-23%below the price$272
Median-51%below the priceTWD 33.16-44%below the price$197
Geometric mean-50%below the priceTWD 33.86-54%below the price$160

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Tah Hsin Industrial: 18 of 19 models see the stock below the current price.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: 22 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Tah Hsin Industrial
Price TWD 68.30
Fair Value TWD 32.87
Bear TWD 31.08Bull TWD 35.31
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
Price $352
Fair Value $225
Bear $154Bull $313

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Tah Hsin Industrial · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside-52% · bottom 25%

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ralph Lauren Corp Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Tah Hsin Industrial trades at TWD 68.30 versus a fair value of TWD 32.87 (-52%), while Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $352 versus $225 (-36%).

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A has the higher quality score (82/100).

Open Ralph Lauren Corp Class A live analysis →
Tah Hsin Industrial · Ralph Lauren Corp Class A

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Tah Hsin Industrial

Amazon.com vs Alibaba Group HoldingAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs Booking HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony Group

Related to Ralph Lauren Corp Class A

Alibaba Group Holding vs TeslaToyota Motor Corporation vs TeslaBooking Holdings vs TeslaMicrosoft vs Nvidia
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.