EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Excel Development vs Quanta Services: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Excel Development (1372) and Quanta Services (PWR) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Excel Development as the less overvalued of the two: Excel Development trades at HK$1.06 versus a fair value of HK$0.34 (−67.8%), while Quanta Services trades at $643 versus $163 (−74.7%).
Excel Development
1372.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
−67.8%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$1.06
Fair ValueHK$0.34
Quality29/100
Quanta Services
PWR · USD · Industrials
−74.7%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$643
Fair Value$163
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Excel DevelopmentQuanta Services
Valuation
11.3×P/E (TTM)72.4×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)32.5×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)30.6×
1.42×P/S (TTM)2.98×
19.00×P/B10.96× · book value is mostly goodwill
11.4×EV/EBITDA33.7×
n/aPEG1.45×
−67.8%Fair value upside−74.7%
n/aDividend yield0.1%
n/aDividend per share$0.43
Profitability
9.0%Operating margin7.2%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.02×
n/aReturn on equity15.3%
3.3%Return on assets5.2%
Growth
14.4%Revenue growth (YoY)41.1%
-4.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
5.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.4%
−42.1%Value creation/yr+16.8%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
1.03×Debt / equity0.59×
$112MMarket cap$98B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Quanta Services, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 5 of the years ex one-offs: 30.6.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Quanta Services leads: 2 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Excel Developmentof which business quality 30 · market factors 33 Quanta Servicesof which business quality 53 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
59
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
59
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
28
55
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
51
36
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
17
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
51
64
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
23
79
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
75

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyExcel DevelopmentPrice HK$1.06Quanta ServicesPrice $643
DCF Models−34.6%below the priceHK$0.69−63.0%below the price$238
Earnings-Based−62.1%below the priceHK$0.40−82.7%below the price$111
Dividend Discountn/a−98.9%below the price$7.07
Multiples−28.0%below the priceHK$0.76−79.8%below the price$130
Asset-Based−97.2%below the priceHK$0.03−93.8%below the price$39.83
Growth DCFn/a−61.1%below the price$250
Economic Profit−87.7%below the priceHK$0.13−89.9%below the price$64.70
Growth Earnings−28.9%below the priceHK$0.75−74.7%below the price$163
Minimum−97.2%below the priceHK$0.03−98.9%below the price$7.07
Maximum−28.0%below the priceHK$0.76−61.1%below the price$250
Median−48.3%below the priceHK$0.55−81.2%below the price$121
Geometric mean−72.4%below the priceHK$0.29−86.9%below the price$84.27

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Excel Development: 8 of 8 models see the stock below the current price.

Quanta Services: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Excel Development
Price HK$1.06
Fair Value HK$0.34
Bear HK$0.28Bull HK$0.39
Quanta Services
Price $643
Fair Value $163
Bear $108Bull $212

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Excel Development · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score29 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−67.8% · bottom 25%

Quanta Services · Industrials

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside−74.7% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Excel Development as the less overvalued of the two: Excel Development trades at HK$1.06 versus a fair value of HK$0.34 (−67.8%), while Quanta Services trades at $643 versus $163 (−74.7%).

Quanta Services has the higher quality score (50/100).

Open Excel Development live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.