EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Raffles Interior vs LT: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Raffles Interior (1376) and LT (LT) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees LT as the less overvalued of the two: Raffles Interior trades at HK$0.10 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-73%), while LT trades at ₹4,057 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).
Raffles Interior
1376.HK · HKD · Industrials
-73%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.10
Fair ValueHK$0.03
Quality41/100
LT
LT.NSE · INR · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹4,057
Fair Value₹1,994
Quality44/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Raffles InteriorLT
Valuation
9.6×P/E (TTM)32.6×
0.19×P/S (TTM)1.80×
1.49×P/B4.80×
EV/EBITDA16.8×
PEG1.06×
Dividend yield1.0%
Dividend per share₹38.00
Profitability
-2%Net margin6%
13%Operating margin11%
27%Return on equity17%
8%Return on assets5%
Growth
71%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
12.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.4%
2.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)16.3%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.58×
$12MMarket cap$55B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Raffles Interior leads: 7 to 3 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Raffles Interiorof which business quality 38 · market factors 27 LTof which business quality 43 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
30
36
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
34
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
16
40
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
56
32
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
97
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
89
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
21
43
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
12
58
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
11
60

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Raffles Interior

DCF ModelsHK$0.03
Earnings-BasedHK$0.02
MultiplesHK$0.04
Asset-BasedHK$0.01
Growth DCFHK$0.02
Economic ProfitHK$0.02

12 of 12 models see the stock below the current price.

LT

DCF Models₹2,695
Earnings-Based₹1,664
Dividend Discount₹649
Multiples₹2,224
Asset-Based₹532
Growth DCF₹2,304
Economic Profit₹1,397
Growth Earnings₹2,459

25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Raffles Interior
Bear HK$0.02Fair Value HK$0.03Bull HK$0.03
HK$0.10 = current price (white tick)
LT
Bear ₹1,109Fair Value ₹1,994Bull ₹2,683
₹4,057 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Raffles Interior · Industrials

Quality score41 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-73% · bottom 25%

LT · Industrials

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-51% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees LT as the less overvalued of the two: Raffles Interior trades at HK$0.10 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-73%), while LT trades at ₹4,057 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).

LT has the higher quality score (44/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.