Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Mao Bao (1732) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Mao Bao trades at TWD 26.80 versus a fair value of TWD 14.51 (-46%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).
Mao Bao
1732.TW · TWD · Consumer Staples
-46%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 26.80
Fair ValueTWD 14.51
Quality75/100
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$146
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Mao BaoProcter & Gamble
Valuation
38.3×P/E (TTM)21.5×
1.63×P/S (TTM)3.95×
2.23×P/B6.58×
13.8×EV/EBITDA14.3×
—PEG4.13×
2.3%Dividend yield2.9%
TWD 0.60Dividend per share$4.23
Profitability
6%Net margin19%
8%Operating margin23%
8%Return on equity31%
5%Return on assets11%
Growth
7%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
4.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.7%
1.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.48×
$35MMarket cap$342B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Procter & Gamble leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Mao Baoof which business quality 74 · market factors 50Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
50
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
73
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
96
85
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
85
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
27
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
83
91
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Mao Bao
DCF ModelsTWD 16.19
Earnings-BasedTWD 8.99
Dividend DiscountTWD 4.61
MultiplesTWD 16.54
Asset-BasedTWD 7.94
Growth DCFTWD 15.66
Economic ProfitTWD 9.94
Growth EarningsTWD 10.98
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Procter & Gamble
DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Mao Bao
Bear TWD 10.88Fair Value TWD 14.51Bull TWD 18.14
TWD 26.80 = current price (white tick)
Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$146 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Mao Bao · Consumer Staples
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-46% · bottom 25%
Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Mao Bao trades at TWD 26.80 versus a fair value of TWD 14.51 (-46%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).
Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (75/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
