EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group vs ANTA Sports Products: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group (1803) and ANTA Sports Products (2020) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ANTA Sports Products as the more attractively valued of the two: Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group trades at HK$0.08 versus a fair value of HK$0.04 (-48%), while ANTA Sports Products trades at HK$71.95 versus HK$120 (+67%).
Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group
1803.HK · HKD · Industrials
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.08
Fair ValueHK$0.04
Quality42/100
ANTA Sports Products
2020.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+67%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$71.95
Fair ValueHK$120
Quality64/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry GroupANTA Sports Products
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)13.4×
0.09×P/S (TTM)2.56×
0.19×P/B3.20×
—EV/EBITDA10.0×
—PEG1.74×
—Dividend yield3.0%
—Dividend per shareHK$2.20
Profitability
-13%Net margin17%
-11%Operating margin21%
-28%Return on equity23%
-6%Return on assets10%
Growth
5%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
40.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)14.3%
9.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)17.7%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.18×
$17MMarket cap$26B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

ANTA Sports Products leads: 3 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Groupof which business quality 42 · market factors 28 ANTA Sports Productsof which business quality 66 · market factors 40
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
8
66
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
54
38
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
15
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
38
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
99
31
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
26
28
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
5
13
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
75

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group

Asset-BasedHK$0.03

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

ANTA Sports Products

DCF ModelsHK$184
Earnings-BasedHK$104
Dividend DiscountHK$44.23
MultiplesHK$95.64
Asset-BasedHK$15.51
Growth DCFHK$147
Economic ProfitHK$68.45
Growth EarningsHK$143

7 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group
Bear HK$0.04Fair Value HK$0.04Bull HK$0.06
HK$0.08 = current price (white tick)
ANTA Sports Products
Bear HK$88.01Fair Value HK$120Bull HK$198
HK$71.95 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group · Industrials

Quality score42 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-48% · below median

ANTA Sports Products · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+67% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ANTA Sports Products as the more attractively valued of the two: Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group trades at HK$0.08 versus a fair value of HK$0.04 (-48%), while ANTA Sports Products trades at HK$71.95 versus HK$120 (+67%).

ANTA Sports Products has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →
Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group · ANTA Sports Products

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Beijing Sports and Entertainment Industry Group

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to ANTA Sports Products

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor CorporationTesla vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.