EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Times Universal Group Holdings vs Las Vegas Sands: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Times Universal Group Holdings (2310) and Las Vegas Sands (LVS) compare, as of Sep 6, 2026.

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Las Vegas Sands as the more attractively valued of the two: Times Universal Group Holdings trades at HK$0.19 versus a fair value of HK$0.04 (-79%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $44.37 versus $51.60 (+16%).
Times Universal Group Holdings
2310.HK · HKD · Real Estate
-79%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.19
Fair ValueHK$0.04
Quality47/100
Las Vegas Sands
LVS · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+16%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$44.37
Fair Value$51.60
Quality70/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Times Universal Group HoldingsLas Vegas Sands
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)17.0×
0.17×P/S (TTM)2.16×
—P/B18.66×
8.2×EV/EBITDA8.4×
0.24×PEG0.93×
−79.1%Fair value upside+16.3%
3.9%Dividend yield2.5%
—Dividend per share$1.10
Profitability
4%Operating margin25%
—Return on equity90%
-2%Return on assets10%
Growth
7%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
6.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)46.9%
14.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)34.7%
—Value creation/yr−5.2%
Balance & size
—Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)4.1×
—Debt / equity9.22×
$20MMarket cap$30B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Las Vegas Sands leads: 2 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Times Universal Group Holdingsof which business quality 44 · market factors 72 Las Vegas Sandsof which business quality 64 · market factors 31
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
36
60
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
58
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
11
68
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
20
29
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
98
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
22
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
97
23
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
85
7
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyTimes Universal Group HoldingsPrice HK$0.19Las Vegas SandsPrice $44.37
DCF Modelsn/a+14%close to the price$50.41
Earnings-Basedn/a-29%below the price$31.58
Dividend Discount-79%below the priceHK$0.04-50%below the price$22.12
Multiples-84%below the priceHK$0.03-13%close to the price$38.80
Asset-Basedn/a-96%below the price$1.61
Growth DCFn/a-25%below the price$33.44
Economic Profitn/a-30%below the price$30.87
Growth Earningsn/a+12%close to the price$49.90
Minimum-84%below the priceHK$0.03-96%below the price$1.61
Maximum-79%below the priceHK$0.04+14%close to the price$50.41
Median-82%below the priceHK$0.04-27%below the price$32.51
Geometric mean-82%below the priceHK$0.03-46%below the price$24.09

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Times Universal Group Holdings: 3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Las Vegas Sands: 13 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Times Universal Group Holdings
Bear HK$0.03Fair Value HK$0.04Bull HK$0.04
HK$0.19 = current price (white tick)
Las Vegas Sands
Bear $22.10Fair Value $51.60Bull $67.52
$44.37 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Times Universal Group Holdings · Real Estate

Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside-79% · bottom 25%

Las Vegas Sands · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+16% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Las Vegas Sands as the more attractively valued of the two: Times Universal Group Holdings trades at HK$0.19 versus a fair value of HK$0.04 (-79%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $44.37 versus $51.60 (+16%).

Las Vegas Sands has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →
Times Universal Group Holdings · Las Vegas Sands

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Times Universal Group Holdings

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Las Vegas Sands

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupPDD Holdings vs TeslaSony Group vs TeslaHome Depot vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.