EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Shenzhou International Group Holdings vs J.D Development Co.: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) and J.D Development Co. (4402) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$34.36 versus a fair value of HK$71.90 (+109%), while J.D Development Co. trades at TWD 14.10 versus TWD 3.89 (-72%).
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+109%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$34.36
Fair ValueHK$71.90
Quality62/100
J.D Development Co.
4402.TWO · TWD · Real Estate
-72%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 14.10
Fair ValueTWD 3.89
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Shenzhou International Group HoldingsJ.D Development Co.
Valuation
7.6×P/E (TTM)n/a
1.84×P/S (TTM)1.36×
1.52×P/B0.05×
5.8×EV/EBITDAn/a
0.88×PEGn/a
+109.3%Fair value upside−72.4%
4.8%Dividend yieldn/a
HK$2.08Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
18%Operating margin-104%
0.80×EBIT margin trend (5Y)n/a
16%Return on equity-2%
7%Return on assets-2%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
3.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-48.3%
6.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)n/a
+7.5%Value creation/yrn/a
Balance & size
17.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)n/a
0.01×Debt / equityn/a
$9BMarket cap$30M
mixedGrowth qualityweak
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 5 to 0 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 22 J.D Development Co.of which business quality 50 · market factors 33
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
53
5
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
33
70
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
42
33
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
94
100
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
57
75
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
11
15
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
15
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
40

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyShenzhou International Group HoldingsPrice HK$34.36J.D Development Co.Price TWD 14.10
DCF Models+104%above the priceHK$70.16n/a
Earnings-Based+29%above the priceHK$44.44n/a
Dividend Discount+16%above the priceHK$39.88n/a
Multiples+96%above the priceHK$67.20n/a
Asset-Based-51%below the priceHK$16.72-58%below the priceTWD 5.88
Growth DCF+38%above the priceHK$47.25n/a
Economic Profit+25%above the priceHK$42.93n/a
Growth Earnings+114%above the priceHK$73.43n/a
Minimum-51%below the priceHK$16.72-58%below the priceTWD 5.88
Maximum+114%above the priceHK$73.43-58%below the priceTWD 5.88
Median+33%above the priceHK$45.84-58%below the priceTWD 5.88
Geometric mean+34%above the priceHK$46.21-58%below the priceTWD 5.88

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings: 3 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

J.D Development Co.: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Price HK$34.36
Fair Value HK$71.90
Bear HK$45.60Bull HK$95.14
J.D Development Co.
Price TWD 14.10
Fair Value TWD 3.89
Bear TWD 2.56Bull TWD 4.86

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+109% · Top 25%

J.D Development Co. · Real Estate

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside-72% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$34.36 versus a fair value of HK$71.90 (+109%), while J.D Development Co. trades at TWD 14.10 versus TWD 3.89 (-72%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

Open Shenzhou International Group Holdings live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.