AVerMedia Technologies vs Corticeira Amorim: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how AVerMedia Technologies (2417) and Corticeira Amorim (COR) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Corticeira Amorim as the more attractively valued of the two: AVerMedia Technologies trades at TWD 43.80 versus a fair value of TWD 14.66 (-67%), while Corticeira Amorim trades at €6.61 versus €8.24 (+25%).
AVerMedia Technologies
2417.TW · TWD · Consumer Discretionary
-67%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 43.80
Fair ValueTWD 14.66
Quality58/100
Corticeira Amorim
COR.LS · EUR · Materials
+25%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price€6.61
Fair Value€8.24
Quality68/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
AVerMedia TechnologiesCorticeira Amorim
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)16.1×
0.05×P/S (TTM)1.21×
0.06×P/B1.35×
—EV/EBITDA7.9×
—PEG0.51×
0.6%Dividend yield5.3%
TWD 0.25Dividend per share€0.35
Profitability
1%Net margin6%
6%Operating margin10%
3%Return on equity7%
1%Return on assets4%
Growth
17%Revenue growth (YoY)-8%
-5.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-5.5%
-13.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.1%
Balance & size
0.07×Debt / equity0.13×
$160MMarket cap$1B
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Corticeira Amorim leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
AVerMedia Technologiesof which business quality 56 · market factors 43Corticeira Amorimof which business quality 69 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
28
46
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
88
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
96
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
43
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
40
32
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
82
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
AVerMedia Technologies
DCF ModelsTWD 21.85
Earnings-BasedTWD 14.65
Dividend DiscountTWD 3.00
MultiplesTWD 16.11
Asset-BasedTWD 14.42
Growth DCFTWD 19.30
Economic ProfitTWD 14.65
16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.
Corticeira Amorim
DCF Models€10.29
Earnings-Based€4.18
Multiples€7.47
Asset-Based€3.78
Growth DCF€12.09
Economic Profit€4.67
Growth Earnings€5.42
7 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
AVerMedia Technologies
Bear TWD 14.58Fair Value TWD 14.66Bull TWD 14.74
TWD 43.80 = current price (white tick)
Corticeira Amorim
Bear €6.18Fair Value €8.24Bull €10.30
€6.61 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
AVerMedia Technologies · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-67% · bottom 25%
Corticeira Amorim · Materials
Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+25% · Top 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Corticeira Amorim as the more attractively valued of the two: AVerMedia Technologies trades at TWD 43.80 versus a fair value of TWD 14.66 (-67%), while Corticeira Amorim trades at €6.61 versus €8.24 (+25%).
Corticeira Amorim has the higher quality score (68/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
