EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co vs DLF: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guangzhou R&F Properties Co (2777) and DLF (DLF) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Guangzhou R&F Properties Co as the less overvalued of the two: Guangzhou R&F Properties Co trades at HK$0.21 versus a fair value of HK$0.17 (-17%), while DLF trades at ₹665 versus ₹146 (-78%).
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co
2777.HK · HKD · Real Estate
-17%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.21
Fair ValueHK$0.17
Quality40/100
DLF
DLF.NSE · INR · Real Estate
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹665
Fair Value₹146
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Guangzhou R&F Properties CoDLF
Valuation
P/E (TTM)36.8×
P/S (TTM)19.87×
P/B3.58×
0.76×PEG0.14×
Dividend yield1.2%
Dividend per share₹8.00
Profitability
-150%Net margin54%
-144%Operating margin21%
-91%Return on equity10%
-2%Return on assets1%
Growth
48%Revenue growth (YoY)-42%
-32.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.9%
-33.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.6%
Balance & size
$100MMarket cap$17B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

DLF leads: 1 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Guangzhou R&F Properties Coof which business quality 40 · market factors 5 DLFof which business quality 66 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
0
39
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
18
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
73
98
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
2
63
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
16
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
34
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co

DCF ModelsHK$3.51
MultiplesHK$4.50
Growth DCFHK$3.86

0 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

DLF

DCF Models₹327
Dividend Discount₹111
Multiples₹147
Asset-Based₹123
Growth DCF₹639
Economic Profit₹181

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co
Bear HK$0.12Fair Value HK$0.17Bull HK$0.22
HK$0.21 = current price (white tick)
DLF
Bear ₹117Fair Value ₹146Bull ₹175
₹665 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co · Real Estate

Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-17% · below median

DLF · Real Estate

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Guangzhou R&F Properties Co as the less overvalued of the two: Guangzhou R&F Properties Co trades at HK$0.21 versus a fair value of HK$0.17 (-17%), while DLF trades at ₹665 versus ₹146 (-78%).

DLF has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.