STOCK COMPARISON
Xgd vs Ricoh Co.: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Xgd (300130) and Ricoh Co. (RICO) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ricoh Co. as the more attractively valued of the two: Xgd trades at ¥19.82 versus a fair value of ¥15.67 (-21%), while Ricoh Co. trades at £15.33 versus £17.99 (+17%).
Xgd
300130.SHE · CNY · Information Technology
-21%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥19.82
Fair Value¥15.67
Quality54/100
Ricoh Co.
RICO.LSE · GBP · Consumer Discretionary
+17%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price£15.33
Fair Value£17.99
Quality60/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
XgdRicoh Co.
Valuation
29.4×P/E (TTM)0.2×
3.69×P/S (TTM)—
2.80×P/B—
22.9×EV/EBITDA0.7×
2.8%Dividend yield2.7%
¥0.60Dividend per share£40.00
Profitability
13%Net margin2%
14%Operating margin3%
9%Return on equity5%
4%Return on assets2%
Growth
24%Revenue growth (YoY)5%
-9.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)6.9%
3.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.2%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.26×
$2BMarket cap$5B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Xgd leads: 6 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Xgdof which business quality 58 · market factors 26
Ricoh Co.of which business quality 60 · market factors 64
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
45
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
49
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
58
55
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
45
78
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
69
71
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
12
55
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
72
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
49
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Xgd
DCF Models¥22.41
Earnings-Based¥13.27
Dividend Discount¥8.80
Multiples¥15.46
Asset-Based¥5.20
Growth DCF¥22.13
Economic Profit¥11.75
Growth Earnings¥19.09
17 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Ricoh Co.
DCF Models£2,491
Earnings-Based£936
Dividend Discount£519
Multiples£1,922
Asset-Based£1,371
Growth DCF£2,352
Economic Profit£1,129
Growth Earnings£1,645
0 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Xgd
Bear ¥12.40Fair Value ¥15.67Bull ¥18.28
¥19.82 = current price (white tick)
Ricoh Co.
Bear £12.57Fair Value £17.99Bull £23.89
£15.33 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Xgd · Information Technology
Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside-21% · above median
Ricoh Co. · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score60 · above median
Fair value upside+17% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ricoh Co. as the more attractively valued of the two: Xgd trades at ¥19.82 versus a fair value of ¥15.67 (-21%), while Ricoh Co. trades at £15.33 versus £17.99 (+17%).
Ricoh Co. has the higher quality score (60/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
