EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co vs WW Grainger: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co (300434) and WW Grainger (GWW) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co as the less overvalued of the two: Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co trades at ¥11.45 versus a fair value of ¥6.88 (-40%), while WW Grainger trades at $1,278 versus $626 (-51%).
Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co
300434.SHE · CNY · Industrials
-40%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥11.45
Fair Value¥6.88
Quality63/100
WW Grainger
GWW · USD · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1,278
Fair Value$626
Quality71/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment CoWW Grainger
Valuation
19.9×P/E (TTM)37.0×
3.41×P/S (TTM)3.53×
1.44×P/B15.69×
11.6×EV/EBITDA21.6×
PEG2.15×
0.9%Dividend yield0.7%
¥0.08Dividend per share$9.04
Profitability
17%Net margin10%
39%Operating margin17%
7%Return on equity46%
4%Return on assets20%
Growth
14%Revenue growth (YoY)10%
-5.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.6%
6.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.57×
$546MMarket cap$65B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co leads: 9 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Coof which business quality 60 · market factors 53 WW Graingerof which business quality 68 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
89
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
35
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
56
46
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
86
72
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
77
55
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
65
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
44
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
55
76
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
80
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co

DCF Models¥7.32
Earnings-Based¥3.63
Dividend Discount¥1.17
Multiples¥6.23
Asset-Based¥4.26
Growth DCF¥6.00
Economic Profit¥4.37
Growth Earnings¥5.73

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

WW Grainger

DCF Models$615
Earnings-Based$340
Dividend Discount$169
Multiples$703
Asset-Based$58.76
Growth DCF$540
Economic Profit$467
Growth Earnings$668

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co
Bear ¥4.80Fair Value ¥6.88Bull ¥8.60
¥11.45 = current price (white tick)
WW Grainger
Bear $368Fair Value $626Bull $949
$1,278 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co · Industrials

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-40% · below median

WW Grainger · Industrials

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-51% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co as the less overvalued of the two: Sichuan Goldstone Orient New Material Equipment Co trades at ¥11.45 versus a fair value of ¥6.88 (-40%), while WW Grainger trades at $1,278 versus $626 (-51%).

WW Grainger has the higher quality score (71/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.