EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Chinese Gamer International vs Konami Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Chinese Gamer International (3083) and Konami Holdings (KNM) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Chinese Gamer International as the less overvalued of the two: Chinese Gamer International trades at TWD 22.85 versus a fair value of TWD 7.34 (-68%), while Konami Holdings trades at £215 versus £65.48 (-69%).
Chinese Gamer International
3083.TWO · TWD · Communication Services
-68%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 22.85
Fair ValueTWD 7.34
Quality65/100
Konami Holdings
KNM.LSE · GBP · Communication Services
-69%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£215
Fair Value£65.48
Quality74/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Chinese Gamer InternationalKonami Holdings
Valuation
31.7×P/E (TTM)0.3×
4.79×P/S (TTM)n/a
1.56×P/Bn/a
76.3×EV/EBITDAn/a
70.04×PEG2.12×
−67.9%Fair value upside−69.5%
1.4%Dividend yield1.2%
TWD 0.33Dividend per share£222
Profitability
-1%Operating margin24%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)2.17×
5%Return on equity19%
1%Return on assets12%
Growth
-4%Revenue growth (YoY)27%
2.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)16.2%
-2.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)12.6%
+0.0%Value creation/yr+26.6%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)303.6×
n/aDebt / equity0.07×
$62MMarket capn/a
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Konami Holdings leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Chinese Gamer Internationalof which business quality 65 · market factors 34 Konami Holdingsof which business quality 73 · market factors 66
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
31
66
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
74
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
64
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
90
99
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
86
40
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
90
53
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
15
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
82
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
81
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChinese Gamer InternationalPrice TWD 22.85Konami HoldingsPrice £215
DCF Models-65%below the priceTWD 8.05+6569%above the price£14,315
Earnings-Based-84%below the priceTWD 3.59+3348%above the price£7,401
Dividend Discount-98%below the priceTWD 0.36+1439%above the price£3,304
Multiples-68%below the priceTWD 7.34+6720%above the price£14,639
Asset-Based-57%below the priceTWD 9.82+1200%above the price£2,790
Growth DCF-63%below the priceTWD 8.42+5922%above the price£12,926
Economic Profit-62%below the priceTWD 8.67+4239%above the price£9,313
Growth Earnings-69%below the priceTWD 7.18+6255%above the price£13,641
Minimum-98%below the priceTWD 0.36+1200%above the price£2,790
Maximum-57%below the priceTWD 9.82+6720%above the price£14,639
Median-66%below the priceTWD 7.69+5080%above the price£11,120
Geometric mean-78%below the priceTWD 4.99+3787%above the price£8,343

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Chinese Gamer International: 21 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

Konami Holdings: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Chinese Gamer International
Price TWD 22.85
Fair Value TWD 7.34
Bear TWD 5.51Bull TWD 9.18
Konami Holdings
Price £215
Fair Value £65.48
Bear £45.83Bull £97.39

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Chinese Gamer International · Communication Services

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-68% · bottom 25%

Konami Holdings · Communication Services

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-69% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Chinese Gamer International as the less overvalued of the two: Chinese Gamer International trades at TWD 22.85 versus a fair value of TWD 7.34 (-68%), while Konami Holdings trades at £215 versus £65.48 (-69%).

Konami Holdings has the higher quality score (74/100).

Open Chinese Gamer International live analysis →
Chinese Gamer International · Konami Holdings

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Chinese Gamer International

Meta Platforms vs NetflixMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs T-Mobile USWalt Disney vs Meta Platforms

Related to Konami Holdings

Meta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs Spotify TechnologyMeta Platforms vs NetEaseAmerica Movil SAB de CV vs Meta Platforms
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.