EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sino-Ocean Group Holding vs DLF: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sino-Ocean Group Holding (3377) and DLF (DLF) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sino-Ocean Group Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Sino-Ocean Group Holding trades at HK$0.05 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-32%), while DLF trades at ₹665 versus ₹146 (-78%).
Sino-Ocean Group Holding
3377.HK · HKD · Real Estate
-32%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.05
Fair ValueHK$0.03
Quality38/100
DLF
DLF.NSE · INR · Real Estate
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹665
Fair Value₹146
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Sino-Ocean Group HoldingDLF
Valuation
0.1×P/E (TTM)36.8×
0.04×P/S (TTM)19.87×
P/B3.58×
0.25×PEG0.14×
Dividend yield1.2%
Dividend per share₹8.00
Profitability
46%Net margin54%
-86%Operating margin21%
34%Return on equity10%
-9%Return on assets1%
Growth
-16%Revenue growth (YoY)-42%
-31.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.9%
-23.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.6%
Balance & size
$82MMarket cap$17B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

DLF leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sino-Ocean Group Holdingof which business quality 36 · market factors 11 DLFof which business quality 66 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
39
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
27
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
56
98
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
13
63
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
30
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
4
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
2
34
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Sino-Ocean Group Holding

DCF ModelsHK$0.50
Dividend DiscountHK$0.18
MultiplesHK$4.16
Growth DCFHK$0.58

0 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

DLF

DCF Models₹327
Dividend Discount₹111
Multiples₹147
Asset-Based₹123
Growth DCF₹639
Economic Profit₹181

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Sino-Ocean Group Holding
Bear HK$0.04Fair Value HK$0.03Bull HK$0.06
HK$0.05 = current price (white tick)
DLF
Bear ₹117Fair Value ₹146Bull ₹175
₹665 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sino-Ocean Group Holding · Real Estate

Quality score38 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-32% · below median

DLF · Real Estate

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sino-Ocean Group Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Sino-Ocean Group Holding trades at HK$0.05 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-32%), while DLF trades at ₹665 versus ₹146 (-78%).

DLF has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.