Bindawood Holding Co vs Loblaw Companies: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Bindawood Holding Co (4161) and Loblaw Companies (L) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
Loblaw Companies leads: 3 to 4 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Bindawood Holding CoPrice SAR 4.66 | Loblaw CompaniesPrice C$61.90 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▲+44%above the priceSAR 6.69 | ▼-16%below the priceC$51.90 |
| Earnings-Based | ▼-54%below the priceSAR 2.14 | ▼-55%below the priceC$28.09 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼-61%below the priceSAR 1.80 | ▼-83%below the priceC$10.70 |
| Multiples | ●+2%close to the priceSAR 4.75 | ▼-24%below the priceC$46.88 |
| Asset-Based | ▼-81%below the priceSAR 0.90 | ▼-90%below the priceC$6.35 |
| Growth DCF | ▲+36%above the priceSAR 6.36 | ●-12%close to the priceC$54.72 |
| Economic Profit | ▼-48%below the priceSAR 2.45 | ▼-58%below the priceC$25.87 |
| Growth Earnings | ●-8%close to the priceSAR 4.28 | ▼-36%below the priceC$39.55 |
| Minimum | ▼-81%below the priceSAR 0.90 | ▼-90%below the priceC$6.35 |
| Maximum | ▲+44%above the priceSAR 6.69 | ●-12%close to the priceC$54.72 |
| Median | ▼-28%below the priceSAR 3.36 | ▼-45%below the priceC$33.82 |
| Geometric mean | ▼-35%below the priceSAR 3.04 | ▼-57%below the priceC$26.72 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Bindawood Holding Co: 13 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Loblaw Companies: 22 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Bindawood Holding Co · Consumer Staples
Loblaw Companies · Consumer Staples
Bottom line
As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Bindawood Holding Co as the less overvalued of the two: Bindawood Holding Co trades at SAR 4.66 versus a fair value of SAR 4.01 (-14%), while Loblaw Companies trades at C$61.90 versus C$44.44 (-28%).
Loblaw Companies has the higher quality score (70/100).
Open Bindawood Holding Co live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Related to Bindawood Holding Co
Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingSee the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.