EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Fitaihi Holding vs Hermes International SCA: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Fitaihi Holding (4180) and Hermes International SCA (RMS) compare, as of Sep 14, 2026.

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Hermes International SCA as the more attractively valued of the two: Fitaihi Holding trades at SAR 2.31 versus a fair value of SAR 0.21 (-91%), while Hermes International SCA trades at €1,400 versus €1,539 (+10%).
Fitaihi Holding
4180.SR · SAR · Consumer Discretionary
-91%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSAR 2.31
Fair ValueSAR 0.21
Quality32/100
Hermes International SCA
RMS.PA · EUR · Consumer Discretionary
+10%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price€1,400
Fair Value€1,539
Quality79/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Fitaihi HoldingHermes International SCA
Valuation
P/E (TTM)39.1×
3.73×P/S (TTM)12.78×
0.37×P/B10.85×
EV/EBITDA27.3×
PEG4.09×
−90.8%Fair value upside+10.0%
1.0%Dividend yield1.2%
SAR 0.03Dividend per share€18.00
Profitability
-15%Operating margin41%
EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.28×
0%Return on equity25%
-1%Return on assets18%
Growth
13%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
-5.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)11.3%
-1.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.2%
−56.3%Value creation/yr+25.5%
Balance & size
Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)119.4×
Debt / equity0.00×
$174MMarket cap$205B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Hermes International SCA leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Fitaihi Holdingof which business quality 33 · market factors 40 Hermes International SCAof which business quality 77 · market factors 24
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
18
82
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
48
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
81
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
76
100
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
96
48
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
90
60
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
28
13
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
3
0
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
81

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyFitaihi HoldingPrice SAR 2.31Hermes International SCAPrice €1,400
DCF Models-90%below the priceSAR 0.24-21%below the price€1,112
Earnings-Based-95%below the priceSAR 0.12-61%below the price€548
Dividend Discount-90%below the priceSAR 0.22-67%below the price€462
Multiples-89%below the priceSAR 0.25-40%below the price€835
Asset-Based-50%below the priceSAR 1.16-91%below the price€121
Growth DCFn/a-44%below the price€788
Economic Profit-55%below the priceSAR 1.03-65%below the price€490
Growth Earnings-90%below the priceSAR 0.24-39%below the price€848
Minimum-95%below the priceSAR 0.12-91%below the price€121
Maximum-50%below the priceSAR 1.16-21%below the price€1,112
Median-90%below the priceSAR 0.24-52%below the price€668
Geometric mean-86%below the priceSAR 0.33-60%below the price€557

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Fitaihi Holding: 10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Hermes International SCA: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Fitaihi Holding
Price SAR 2.31
Fair Value SAR 0.21
Bear SAR 0.16Bull SAR 0.26
Hermes International SCA
Price €1,400
Fair Value €1,539
Bear €994Bull €1,892

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Fitaihi Holding · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score32 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-91% · bottom 25%

Hermes International SCA · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+10% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Hermes International SCA as the more attractively valued of the two: Fitaihi Holding trades at SAR 2.31 versus a fair value of SAR 0.21 (-91%), while Hermes International SCA trades at €1,400 versus €1,539 (+10%).

Hermes International SCA has the higher quality score (79/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.