EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co vs Las Vegas Sands: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co (5905) and Las Vegas Sands (LVS) compare, as of Aug 25, 2026.

As of Aug 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Las Vegas Sands as the more attractively valued of the two: Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co trades at TWD 7.92 versus a fair value of TWD 1.77 (-78%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $46.97 versus $51.60 (+10%).
Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co
5905.TWO · TWD · Consumer Discretionary
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 7.92
Fair ValueTWD 1.77
Quality30/100
Las Vegas Sands
LVS · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+10%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$46.97
Fair Value$51.60
Quality70/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement CoLas Vegas Sands
Valuation
P/E (TTM)17.0×
0.05×P/S (TTM)2.16×
P/B18.66×
10.0×EV/EBITDA8.4×
PEG0.93×
1.6%Dividend yield2.3%
Dividend per share$1.10
Profitability
-11%Net margin13%
-4%Operating margin25%
-9%Return on equity90%
-1%Return on assets10%
Growth
175%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
3.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)46.9%
-1.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)34.7%
Balance & size
0.31×Debt / equity9.22×
$76MMarket cap$30B
weakGrowth qualitymixed

Las Vegas Sands leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Coof which business quality 30 · market factors 38 Las Vegas Sandsof which business quality 64 · market factors 35
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
6
60
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
58
58
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
25
68
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
29
29
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
65
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
81
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
29
27
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
16
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
22
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co

Dividend DiscountTWD 1.65
MultiplesTWD 2.40
Asset-BasedTWD 6.62

4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Las Vegas Sands

DCF Models$50.41
Earnings-Based$31.58
Dividend Discount$22.12
Multiples$38.80
Asset-Based$1.61
Growth DCF$33.44
Economic Profit$30.87
Growth Earnings$49.90

15 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co
Bear TWD 1.24Fair Value TWD 1.77Bull TWD 2.32
TWD 7.92 = current price (white tick)
Las Vegas Sands
Bear $22.10Fair Value $51.60Bull $67.52
$46.97 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score30 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%

Las Vegas Sands · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+10% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Las Vegas Sands as the more attractively valued of the two: Nan Ren Hu Leisure Amusement Co trades at TWD 7.92 versus a fair value of TWD 1.77 (-78%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $46.97 versus $51.60 (+10%).

Las Vegas Sands has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.